The guest stairs falling the swimming pool without skids and slippers, no water stains are responsible

The weather is hot, and many citizens like to go to the swimming pool to cool down the heat, but they often cause disputes on safety issues. A female guest went to a bath center in Haicheng to take a bath and swim. When she went downstairs after swimming, she accidentally fell at the stairs. She couldn't get up at that time. After the incident, the female guests have been negotiated with the bathing center for no compensation. Recently, the court tried this civil dispute according to law.

The plaintiff's female guest believes that the bathing center has failed to reach the obligation of warning notifications. The stairs are laid tiles and water stains, causing themselves to fall, and the bathing center should bear the corresponding compensation liability. Bathing centers insured a public liability insurance at a insurance company, and the insurance company shall compensate within the insurance limit, and the insufficient part shall be borne by the bath center.

The defendant's insurance company argued that the accident was verified by the plaintiff's injury to the staircase where the insurer managed the area. Although the ride floor was smooth, there were obvious yellow signs next to the safe exit of the down stairs (carefully slippery). Reminder, and the red significant logo on the stairs is to remind customers that because the insured is a hot spring bath place, water on the ground cannot be avoided. Therefore, the defendant's bath center should not deal with the plaintiff's liability for any infringement. The plaintiff as an adult has the obligation of cautious attention and careful attention, and he also has a major fault to the major damage he suffered, and he should also bear responsibility.

The court found that in May last year, when the plaintiff went downstairs after swimming in the bath center, he accidentally fell at the stairs and was hospitalized. The court believes that hotels, shopping malls, banks, stations, airports, stadiums, entertainment venues and other operating places, operators, managers, or organizers of public places have not fulfilled their obligations of security and cause damage to others. Bringing liability should be assumed. In this case, the slippers provided by the defendant's bath center are not non -slip slippers. The ground is slippery and not cleaned up in time, causing the plaintiff's injury, not fully fulfilling the obligations of security, and shall bear the liability for infringement. At the same time, the plaintiff, as a person who fulfilled the ability of civilian behavior, did not fully fulfill the obligations of careful attention, and should also bear some responsibilities. In conjunction with the actual situation of the case, the court believed that the plaintiff assumed 30%of the responsibility, and the defendant's bath center assumed 70%of the responsibility. The defendant's bathing center shall bear the limit of public liability insurance and shall be borne by the defendant's insurance company. In summary, in accordance with the "Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on the Application of Laws on the Application of Laws of Personal Damage Compensation Cases" and the Supreme People's Court, the defendant's insurance company compensated the plaintiff for more than 20,000 yuan; the defendant's bath center compensated the plaintiff 2,000 yuan. All media reporter Zhang Ling

- END -