The American media in the United States, bringing out Perosi "Black History"

This article is reproduced from the WeChat public account "Reference News" (ID: CKXXWX). The original first was released on July 20, 2022. The original text is deleted.

"Pass this damn bill, and then give it to me!"

In May this year, US President Biden said in Ohio.

The "damn" bill in Biden's mouth actually has a well -known name: "2022 American Competition Act", also known as the "chip bill". In fact, this bill is not "damn" at all. On the contrary, it is a "fragrant citron". At the moment when the American party competes with such serious opposition, it is a rare bill that has been supported by the Republican and democratic members of the Democratic Party.

In June last year, the U.S. Senate passed the so -called "chip bill" with an overwhelming advantage of 68 votes on 32 votes.

However, it was unexpected that the bill has been stuck in the House of Representatives for 8 months since then. The US House of Representatives only launched its own version of the "chip bill" in February this year, and it is very different from the Senate version. The committee came to coordinate the two versions, and the committee only met for the first time in May.

Seeing that the legislative process was delayed, it was necessary to "rush the performance" before the midterm election, and then the words at the beginning of the article.

Why is the bill that the two parties want to push unanimously? The key to the Washington Post: The real problem is that the two -party bill this time is really popular. Members know that the bill is likely to be passed, so it is carried by private goods to create a similar to the national defense authorization bill That "Christmas tree effect".

After so long, the "Chip Act" finally made new progress: the Senate passed a procedural voting with 64 votes in favor and 34 votes on the 19th to vote for the bills of the two hospitals next weekend. Foundation.

However, at this time, someone suspected of "private goods" was exposed: the Pelosi couple.

On July 16, the Fox News Network broke the news that the document of the US House of Representatives Peros' office disclosed that her husband Paul Perocei bought a semiconductor company with millions of stocks worth millions of stocks a week before voting at the "Chip Act" vote. Essence At that time, many US netizens accused Paul Pelossey suspected of insider transactions.

After another 3 days, the Fox News Network, which is still unsatisfactory, "replenished the knife" that the United States CNN, the US Broadcasting Corporation (ABC), and the Columbia Broadcasting Corporation (CBS) such as Paul Pelosi " Card point "buying stocks selectively ignored.

Report screenshot

It is reported that according to the search from the Fox journalist, the above media did not mention Paul Pelosi in the golden time report from July 15th to 18th, and the incident was "not accidental" because they did not want to annoy the Speaker Essence

Fox News did not forget to turn over the old account, and pointed out that in the early days of the outbreak of the new crown pneumonia in the United States in 2020, Richard Berr, then chairman of the American Senate Intelligence Committee, had been sold by CNN and ABC and other media such as selling stocks before the stock market plunge. "Siege", at the time they were not as silent as they are now.

As we all know, the pro -Republican media Fox News and the main party media CNN are not dealt with. Of course, Fox News will not let go of this so -called "liberal media" such as the so -called "liberal media" and send it to the social media platforms such as Twitter According to the tweet, the news that Peros and stocks related to stocks were not without other media reports, and the links such as CBS such as CBS were attached.

When you open the link, you can find that the entanglement between Pelosi and the stock market has become the focus of media attention at least ten years ago. CBS reported in November 2011 that the Pelosi couple participated in at least eight "first public fundraising" (IPO) at least eight times. At that time Observing the rules of strict interest conflict, but the legislators are not, this is a problem.

The CBS's ace news column "60 minutes" also reported on a special report on parliamentarians suspected insider trading in June 2012.

This episode particularly emphasized that Pelosi rejected a reporter's interview. When the show was broadcast, Pelosi also accused it of "right wing discreditation".

In the next ten years, it should be said that Pelosi has been "converged" than before -at least she does not hold stocks, so in recent years, when there is a media accusing Paul Pelossey suspected of insider trading, Nancy Pei Pei, Southern Gram Peeli, Southern Gepei Peiosi, Southern Gram Peeli, Southern Gepei Peelsi, Southern Gram Peeli, Southern Gepei Peelsi, Southern Gram Peeli, Southern Gram Peelsi, Southern Gram Peelsi, Southern Gepei Peelsi, Southern Gram Peeli, Southern Gram Peelsi, Southern Gram Peelsi, Southern Gepei Peelsi, Southern Gram Peeli, Southern Gram Peelsi, Southern Gram Peelsi, Southern Gram Peeli. Losi's office will respond to Perosi himself who does not hold stocks and knows about related transactions.

But not holding does not mean that she does not want to hold it. Perlis proposed in December 2021 that although the US members knew inside information, they should also allow them to participate in stock transactions. Former officials who had worked at the Obama government moral supervision agency commented that this idea was "disgusting."

In April 2012, the then US President Barack Obama signed a bill to limit the inside trading of Congress: the "Prohibition of the use of the Congress Intelligence Trading Law". It is illegal.

At that time, Obama said: "We put on today's position to serve the American people and pay attention to their interests, not focusing on our own interests." From the perspective of the Perlis couple's words and deeds, they did not agree with this.

- END -