Strict crackdown on refusal to commit crimes!Provincial High Court released five typical cases

Recently, the Provincial High Court issued five typical cases of cracking down on non -enforcement judgments and rulings. The case released this time involves illegal disposal of the damage to the property involved, the compensation for the transfer of the demolition and demolition of others, the hidden transfer of the house, and the violation of the repayment commitment, etc., to highlight the people's court to severely crack down on the firm attitude and determination of refusing crimes in accordance with the law. Essence

Case 1 Destroy the property involved in the case without authorization

The defendant Li should repay the plaintiff's debt of 14 million yuan. After the court's decision, Li had not fulfilled its legal obligations, and the plaintiff applied to the executive court for compulsory enforcement.

The court seized the land and above -ground buildings under the name of Li's operating company in accordance with the law. However, in the process of transfer, the executive judge found that a steel structure house worth more than 1.87 million yuan was demolished and damaged. After investigation, Li had unauthorized the case involved in the building and sold it at a price of 66,000 yuan.

The court sentenced the defendant Li to the defendant Li for one year and 10 months after he tried the judgment (hereinafter referred to as "referred to the crime") and ruled that the defendant Li was sentenced to 66,000 yuan for the defendant.

Case 2 Malicious transfer and demolition funds

On August 23, 2017, the plaintiff Changmou and Wang asked the defendant Jingmou to return the loan of 300,000 yuan. On September 1, 2017, the court of first instance seized the case involved in the case under the name of Jingmou. 1st to September 1, 2020.

After entering the execution procedure, the executive court delivered a notice and reporting the property order to the executed person Jingmou, but Jingmou did not report the property situation to the court and did not repay the loan and interest. On March 18, 2019, the Court of Executive Court posted a house announcement on the seizure case. In order to escape the implementation, in June 2020, Jing had signed a demolition agreement with a real estate company to transfer 920,000 yuan to his son's account. After three judicial detention of the executive judge, he still did not cooperate with the execution work.

The court sentenced the defendant to the defendant Jingmou for one year in the first instance. The court in the second instance believed that, in view of the repayment of Jingmou's family members to Wang and Changmou, it was sentenced to 8 months in prison.

Three major expenditures of the case refuse to execute

The executed person, Shi Mou, should return the applicant, Chen, 1.5 million yuan to borrow money and interest, and Mo Mou always evaded the obligation to fulfill his decision. After investigation, from April 2019 to May 2021, the personal account and cash income of Xingye Bank of Xingye Bank of Employment, the executed person, was 420,000 yuan. There are unreasonable expenditures of more than 210,000 yuan. The court sentenced the defendant to the defendant for nine months in prison for rejection.

Case four hidden disposal transfer property

The defendant Li should pay the plaintiff Wang's workers' salary of more than 490,000 yuan. After entering the execution process, the court frozen Li's bank account and deducted more than 11,000 yuan through the network inspection and control system. In order to escape the implementation of the court, Li refused to fulfill his obligations on the grounds of no property, and sold all the actual real estate at 350,000 yuan without authorization. He also clearly instructed the buyer to bring the house to his father's account. At the same time, the two companies that Li actually operated still had a income of 590,000 yuan during its implementation.

After the incident, Li ’s family members fulfilled their complete arrears on their behalf.

Case five violations of repayment commitments

According to the effective civil mediation letter, the defendant Wang should repay the plaintiff Jingmou 2,000 yuan per month from September 1st to November 30th, 2018. After Wang fulfilled the fruitless, Jing Mou on January 25, 2019 to the court to the court on January 25, 2019 to the court. Apply for compulsory execution.

Not only did Wang not apply for personal property information, but instead transferred the real estate under his name to Zhang Mou's name by signing the property agreed book. In March 2020, Wang gave the salary received by the month to his wife for use, and still refused to fulfill his repayment obligation. The court sentenced the defendant Wang to the defendant Wang for 4 months after hearing the trial and the probation was probed for 6 months.

According to reports, the province's courts will issue rewards for reward, exposure to dishonestyes, and public execution clues to report on a typical case of cracking down on illegal crimes. A spokesman for the Provincial High Court said: "Any maliciously evading behavior will be supervised and sanctioned by law.

Source: Shanxi Daily

Graphic production: Shanxi Radio and Television Finance Media

Want to know more exciting content, come and follow Shanxi Radio and Television Railway Media

- END -