Extremely review | "Lexus accident" Save man driver should not be blame

Xu Hanxiong, a polar news commentator

On July 28, the Guigang section of the Liubei Expressway, a Lexus business car was locked after an accident occurred. The three were trapped in the car. After the on -site video was spread online, the driver who shot the video and called for rescue, including other drivers participating in the rescue, were rioted to varying degrees. (According to July 30th news "" Lexus accident ", many rescue drivers were rescued by the Internet, the parties responded")

Most netizens expressed support for the rescue driver (screenshot of the source network of the picture source)

Some netizens questioned that the video of the video would only move, and some netizens questioned several drivers at the rescue site. "Why not smash the side window glass? The last driver went in the car, why not pull people out?"

Understanding the feelings of netizens, everyone hopes that all the trapped people in the car accident can be rescued and safe. Netizens' "Zhuge afterwards" is a kind desire for this ideal result, such as: preferentially rescue the two female passengers and rescue the male driver. If so, the process is touching and the ending is also beautiful. But at a critical moment, saving one is one, and it cannot be designed according to the ideal design.

On the 29th, the first driver who got off the car and recorded the driver Yang (Hua's surname) released a video saying that the shooting was to record the scene. People.

On the 30th, another driver, Mr. Zhao, who participated in the rescue, said that the scene was a bit confusing at the time, and he really needed a person like Mr. Yang to conduct command. They did not smash the side glass for the first time because they did not know if there were anyone in the back row, and they were afraid of causing mistakes. Later, they thought that the windshield after smashing would definitely not hurt people, and they could see the situation in the car. At that time, my fingers were also scratched. "

Mr. Zhao's words confirmed that on -site rescue will not be in accordance with the procedures that netizens imagined, and thanks to a person like Mr. Yang reminded. The so -called authorities are fascinated by the bystanders. Netizens' "soberness in the world" also expressed opinions from the perspective of "onlookers" after the incident. At the rescue site, in a hurry, how can it be everywhere.

Mr. Zhao said that he first held the man with a crowbar to pry the door to rescue the driver's seat, and the woman with the co -pilot was also held by several truck drivers from the window. Mr. Zhao did not know if there were other people in the car. For a time, he wanted to smash the glass back glass with a crowbar. After smashing the glass, he found that there was a woman sitting in the middle of the row, but she shouted two times without replying. lose consciousness. Everyone pulled and found that the woman's legs were pinched and could not move. Later, the front of the car began to get angry, and the fire extinguishing was effective. The car has been burned, and the possibility of explosion at any time can only give up rescue.

"You can't save death", this kind of pain and helplessness. Only the rescue driver who is in charge can most experience it. They want to save the last person than anyone else, and they are the most unwilling to see the rescue. Mr. Zhao said, "I am very distressed and uncomfortable on the road." He was deeply distressed to save the last person.

Therefore, rational netizens understand that saving the driver is brave, and it is a hero. Their seeing the spirit of righteousness is the spirit. If there is a word of words, it will only cool the hearts of the good people, and who dares to save people again in the future.

In fact, in order to encourage and protect the righteousness, the Civil Code stipulates the exemption of emergency rescue to others. "If the rescue is damaged due to voluntary emergency rescue behavior, the rescue person will not bear civil liability." In this incident, when the emergency rescue behavior is implemented, even if the glass hurts people, there is no responsibility.

Therefore, Yu Fa, Yu Qing, Yu, and the righteousness of saving drivers should be affirmed and should not be picked. A netizen who claimed to be a woman who was killed in a car accident said, "They have tried their best, and I really thank the rescue staff." This is the attitude of understanding and it is worthy of recognition.

- END -