The community security sneak shot female owner skirt bottom?Police: No privacy video was found, and there was no evidence to prove candid shots

Jimu Journalist Zhang Wanjun

On July 26, a netizen released a video online saying that a security guard in a community in Zhoukou, Henan has repeatedly photographed the bottom of the female owner's skirt. On July 27, the police police responded that there was a video of female owners and friends in the security mobile phone, but it did not involve privacy. There was no evidence to prove that he sneaked the bottom of the female owner's skirt.

According to online videos, some people said to a man wearing a security clothing: "Are you still talking hard?" Later, the man said to the camera: "I'm wrong, I admit the mistake, I do it wrong, I am a security guard, I am a security guard, I am a security guard, as a security guard, I am a security guard. I am a security guard. I am a security guard. , I did not fulfill the responsibility of the security, no next time. "

(Source: Screenshot of the Internet Video)

The video publisher said that the man in the video was a security guard in a community in Zhoukou, Henan. He had repeatedly photographed the female owner's skirt at the bottom of the female owner, and the property company did not handle it. The parties have called the police, and the police found a picture of a number of female owners on the security mobile phone.

On July 26, a female owner in the community said in an interview with the media that a security guard in the community repeatedly registered for the signing of himself in the security room, and then took the opportunity to sneak down his skirt. She had discovered once before, and after complaining to the property, the other party recorded an apology video, and she did not investigate it again. On the same day, the other party took the mobile phone and kept taking the police again. After the police came, he found that there were still many other women's underwear photos in his mobile phone, and he warned him verbally.

On July 27, Jimu Journalists contacted the video publisher. She said that she had been interviewed by the media, and other circumstances were not convenient to say.

Jimu Journalists contacted the property in the community, and a staff member said that there was no security of the female owner's skirt at the community. On July 26, a female owner called the police that after being sneaked, the police arrived on the scene to investigate. Any treatment, and then left. Considering that the security was involved in the storm, the property had fired it.

On July 27, the police who handled the matter told Jimu Journalists that the video publisher was a friend of the female owner, and the situation released on the Internet was somewhat disconnected. On July 26, he checked the security of the security guard's mobile phone when he was on the police. There was a small video involving female owners and his friends, but the video did not involve privacy and did not constitute illegal laws. Persuasion. He learned that the female owner and security guard had previously had contradictions, and the property mediated the two parties.

- END -