It costs 1.57 million to buy a "fierce house" delaying life -long events ... Hot search first!

"China Business Daily"

Recently,#近 近 1.57 million bought a murderous house delayed the lifelong event#近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 360 million.

A man in Sichuan said that he purchased a second -hand house for more than 1.57 million yuan through the chain house intermediary, and found that he was a "murderer" after check -in.

When he learned that there was an abnormal death in his house, he began to verify more neighbors. After a number of neighbors introduced, in January 2020, the house had killed the child falling off the building. He confirmed the incident again from the female landlord, and said to me that the female landlord did not recognize him about "non -normal death". She believed that this was an accident. "No one wants to happen in this kind of thing." Divorced with her husband.

The female landlord believes that Xiang Mou was not clearly understood as a buyer at that time and did not ask, and she was in sadness, and it was impossible to say this. Xiang Mou said that this is not a question you want to say, but the obligation of notification that the house and the intermediary must fulfill.

He asked the landlord to check out that he was hacked, and the chain family said they were also victims.

"This is the house we bought for the whole family." He originally prepared to get married this year, but after his girlfriend knew this, he would not come to his house. He was very anxious about it, saying that he would not solve the matter, and he was about to delay life.

On July 22, a person in charge of the chain company stated that the chain family would fulfill the promise to repurchase the house in accordance with the relevant process and refund the commission. The chain home now also preliminarily believes that the former landlord concealed information about "non -normal death" in the house to the customer and the intermediary company, but it also needs to wait for the court's judgment to confirm the nature of the "murderer" in the legal procedure, and the chain home can talent He started to repurchase.

The man -purchased man sued the court to the court and Sichuan Lianjia Real Estate Brokerage Co., Ltd. on the grounds that he was "intentional fraud and concealing the conservation of a serious breach of contract". At present, the People's Court of Jinjiang District, Chengdu has been accepted.

Netizens hotly discussion:

Zhu Yueyue: Under normal circumstances, buying this "murderer" is definitely obscure, and the buyer is intending to get married.

Chen Shiyi CC: Generally, the intermediary will receive a house, and they will understand the ins and outs of the house, especially the low price house. If the landlord does not say, then go to the door of the community to chat with the uncle and aunt.

The younger girl who is getting happier: This is not necessarily an intermediary pot. How do you know how do you know? How to check? Don't mention that the intermediary is so hateful, it is not too late to find out until the court finds it.

Lawyer Liu Guangming: The court's referee also relieved the sales contract. The seller refunded the money, the seller had check out, and the liability for compensation was based on the fault of both parties. If the chain family waits for the judgment to start the repurchase, the promise of the so -called "house screening and the highest original price repurchase" is obviously flickering consumers.

It's just a passer -by: this chain family must be responsible. Buying a house is a big deal. You must ask in advance!

Back to 66902: Some say that people usually do not believe in ghosts and gods but believe in murderous houses. This belongs to consumers' right to know, and concealment does not report to deceive consumers.

Joscx: Some people will buy the murderer, but it is by no means the price of normal second -hand houses.

Too many news:

I paid all 100,000 gold, but I heard that I bought a "murderer"

Court: Revisit the contract, return the deposit

Earlier, Orange Persima Interactive reported this news: the "House Transfer Contract" was signed and paid a deposit of 100,000 yuan, but suddenly learned that the house I bought was actually a "murderer". Refund, what should I do?

In June of this year, the Pinghu Court tried such a case of disputes in the house trading contract. Because the housing seller did not tell the house that had occurred abnormal death in the house, the court determined that the behavior constituted a fraud. The final judgment: the contract was revoked, and the deposit was 100,000 yuan.

At the end of March 2021, Zhang, who wanted to buy a second -hand housing, met Wang and Shen and his wife through real estate agencies. The couple claimed that they wanted to change the house with a larger area, so they were anxious to sell the existing house with an area of ​​86 square meters.

Zhang looked at this house and immediately talked about the price with the couple of Wang and Shen. The two parties signed the "House Transfer Contract", which stipulated that the total price of the house was 1.35 million yuan. Zhang paid a deposit of 100,000 yuan on the same day.

A few days later, Zhang talked about buying a house in the circle of friends. It was a happy thing, but I did not expect a friend to say that this house was a "murderer" and had committed suicide.

When Zhang learned of this, he immediately contacted the Wang and Shen couple through the intermediary, asking for a refund to check out. But the couple of Wang and Shen said they did not know about it and did not agree with the refund. After repeated negotiations, the couple had gone black and refused to communicate.

In desperation, Zhang sued the Pinghu Court, demanding that his "House Transfer Contract" signed with Wang and Shen, and returned a deposit of 100,000 yuan.

The court found that in early March 2021, the defendant Wang and Shen and his wife had signed a house purchase contract with the outsider Ruan. Soon after, Ruan also inquired about suicide in the house involved in the house. In order to lift the purchase contract, Ruan was voluntarily undertake a deposit loss of 50,000 yuan.

After hearing, the court believed that the parties to establish a contract should follow the principles of honesty. The defendant Wang and Shen once lifted a house purchase contract with the outsider Ruan, and the two should know or should know about the case involved in the house involved in the house. However, Wang and Shen informed the plaintiff Zhang in truthfully that Zhang signed a contract with him in violation of the true meaning. The behavior of the defendant Wang and Shen constituted fraud. According to the relevant provisions of the Civil Code, the plaintiff Zhang had the right to request the people's court to revoke the contract. The current contract involved was revoked by the defendant Wang and Shen's fault, and the two should return a deposit of 100,000 yuan. After the case was judged, the parties were not appealing, and the defendant Wang and Shen fulfilled the obligation to pay for money.

The judge reminds that civil subjects should follow the principles of integrity, uphold the honesty, adhere to their promises, and must not violate the law, and must not violate public order and customs. Although there is no compulsory provision of the current law about whether the house seller should take the initiative to disclose whether the house has had an abnormal death incident, choosing a good and living is a pursuit of a better life, and it should be respected and obeyed. Although the "fierce house" does not affect the normal use of the house, as far as the general transaction concept is concerned, it is likely to affect the buyer's decision and the market value of the house. Therefore, based on the requirements of honesty trust and the principles of public order and customs, the housing seller has the obligation to actively inform the house of non -normal death.

Source: Metropolis Express Comprehensive Surging News, Orange Persima Interactive Report Earlier

- END -