Learn from those with results. What is the problem with this view?Do you deserve your own own?
Author:Liu Xiaoshang Time:2022.07.23
We often hear others say, "To learn from those who get the result", is it that many people have heard similar words? This sentence is very attractive and incariently instigated by intuition, but we have to be cautious. Treat this point of incherhood. Not to mention that they ignore the role of randomness or luck in the result, and exaggerate their own efforts, the importance of specific methods and skills in the result. More importantly, the difference between this view is vaguely different from the "ownership" and moral "deserved", and it also wrongly guides our value orientation, which is actually very dangerous.
First of all, here I do not deny the value of hard work itself, but on the contrary, we are encouraging the value of our own efforts. Secondly, we must treat the causal relationship between hard work and success, and good results, because there may be two key hints in it: the first is that this statement makes us ignore or weaken our efforts that we have weakened our efforts. The value of itself is because it allows us to guide the focus to "get results".
In other words, the saying of "learning from those who get the result" means that we should pay attention to the results. The result is the most important thing, and the process of hard work is only a means to get the result. Good efforts are worthless, this is the first hint.
Compared to the first hint, the second hint is more hidden and more dangerous. "Learning to the person who got the result" actually implied that the results of the results are more worthy of social respect. They have a sense of moral superiority and moral legitimacy. People are not worth learning. This hint will make the results, success, and morality. It is a misleading moral orientation and value. It will further allow us to ignore and deny the value of our own efforts. Many people may not gain the so -called success for the time being. And self -denial, even morally unacceptable.
Behind this kind of thought, in fact, it involves the values and moral outlook on society. We should praise and reward those who are more fruitful, or should praise and encourage those who may have no results but still work very hard. In the view of "learning from the results", we chose the former and weakened the latter. Then we have further asked, why can't we simply praise the results of the results? Because, the "result" and moral "should be achieved" are not the same thing.
Let me give a first example of incitement and extreme. Assuming that there are two sales staff competing for the sales championship. The first person is very hard to stay up late every day, and work is also dedicated. The relationship between people easily got the big list of Dad's enterprises and became a sales champion. As a result, goodness and moral justice are often not the same thing, and we are habitually equal. On the one hand, we praise the personal quality of positive efforts, but on the other hand, we actually ignore the value of the effort itself, and the importance of praise the results.
Of course, you may think that this example is too extreme, but it may not be exaggerated. A person's fact "result" or "own" is obtained by the "effort" of its own extent. Philosophers Sandr's point of view in "Elite's Pride" cited Roses's point of view: What caused us to "have" is largely determined by "luck". Natural endowment, family environment, social environment, and opportunities of the times. These are all these. It is outside our own efforts, but their success to a person, or the result of a person's own, is crucial, or even a decisive.
In terms of morality, things that should be owned by their own efforts should be "deserved" by a person, instead of "owning" things such as talents and opportunities in their own efforts. Shopping, hard work and results are not the same.
If it is only the number of students, the number of students in Confucius' life may not be as good as a student who teaches others from the media on the Internet, but the reason why Confucius and Mencius, Laozhuang and other ancient sages are great. Achievements and obtained the so -called result lies in their noble moral qualities. What a society encourages and praise is not just a value orientation, but also a moral orientation. We need to be cautious to give any results with moral value, which is very important.
On the other hand, those who succeed in the secular sense often overestimate the role of their own efforts in success. Not only that, they also want to fight for their success and strive for some moral legitimate legitimate legitimacy. sex. The philosopher Max Weber said: Lucky people rarely satisfy the fact that they have good luck. In addition, he also wants to confirm that he has the right to get his good luck. The most important thing is that he wants to confirm that he is more good at this good luck compared to others. He also wanted to confirm that the misfortunes that were not so lucky were just what they deserved.
Sander said in the book "Elite's Pride": Awareness of the role of luck in life will make us humble. This humble spirit is the virtue we need now. It drives us to redefine the concept of success and point out the direction for us to a little less resentment and more tolerance.
A person's gender, race, region, physical condition, talent intelligence, family background, and the opportunity of the times, etc. We are collectively referred to as "luck". In fact, it has nothing to do with ourselves, especially with our own efforts and efforts. Too many relationships, but they decide to many extent. What kind of parents do you have, what kind of educational resources do you get, what kind of university you enter, how much chance of failure, and you also determine who you are competing with. What kind of friends have. Even it also determines the degree of effort and what kind of personality quality you have. These seemingly cultivated quality in reality is actually a lot of talent blessings. Maybe many people do not admit that some people are naturally calm and dedicated and have strong will; some people are lively and active, and they have divergent thinking. These endowments do not have the differences between the high and low and low and low and low and low, but whether they fully use you to give up you. The talent, in fact, is largely determined by your family environment, social environment and the background of the times. What kind of quality of social encouragement and need is not what you decide. A person who is very good at playing table tennis is born in Brazil and Argentina. He is likely to do nothing because he is not good at football and even complains.
Even in the same family, the same family environment and poor family education methods. The performance of the two children in learning is likely to be different. The reason may be that their teachers prefer one of them, and they have given more. Encouragement. We do not deny the importance of hard work the day after tomorrow. In fact, the opposite is the opposite. What I want to emphasize is the value of hard work itself, but the value of the result.
Because, fundamentally, the result is very random, and the effort itself is really worthy of encouragement, and it is truly moral value. Do not deny your own efforts because of your efforts. On the contrary, don't have a sense of moral superiority because you get the result. As Sandell said that only if we realize the role of luck in life can we become more humble. This is the spirit and quality of our society.
We must understand that "ownership" cannot be simply equivalent to moral "deserved".
Therefore, it is not necessary to learn from those who have results to become a person who keeps hard. We should also praise those who work hard and work hard, but have not succeeded for the time being, and have not obtained the results. Because what we praise should always be hard work, not a consequence of strong randomness.
The value of hard work is far greater than the result, and the effort itself is the source of our meaning of life.
Well, this is the content of today. If you like my content, please like the collection and follow me. See we next article.
- END -
Lianyungang City Haizhou Public Security successfully cut off a telecommunications network fraud chain
Zhonghong.com Jiangsu, June 17th. Recently, the Haizhou Public Security Branch of ...
Why is it convicted of being sentenced to destroying traffic facilities?
While stealing the well cover on the road at night, is the crime of theft or the crime of destroying traffic facilities? The prosecutor's on -site investigation, consolidating the evidence, and finall...