Multiple European politicians groups ask for "one vote veto system". What does it mean?丨 Phoenix Observation

The German Chancellor Tsutz recently publicized the EU for the first time to cancel the "one -vote veto system", and the EU leaders and the European Parliament also supported the "small obedience to the majority system" to replace the "unanimous consent principle".

How does the "one -vote veto system" hinder the EU's actions, and why do these European politicians form a group voice? What does the EU's small and medium -sized member states think about this? Once the "one -vote veto" is really banned, what will the "minority obedience to the majority" cause? Look at today's European observation--

German Prime Minister Tsutz recently publicly stated in an article published by German media for the first time that the war caused by Russia to send troops in Ukraine has made Europe more urgently need to be united. The EU's individual members of the EU should be over because of their own self -interest, and this situation should be over.

Tsugs also believes that in the competition in large powers, if Europe wants to continue to speak, if the European Union wants to continue to lead a leading position on the international stage, it will not tolerate the veto behavior of individual member countries in the EU foreign policy. The German Foreign Minister has also pointed out that some member states can no longer continue to use the "one -vote veto" to hijack the EU as hostage.

The European Parliament also passed the bill a few days ago, and suggested that the European Union cancel the relevant terms of the "one -vote veto system" to punish members of those who have been accused of violating European values. The European Parliament recommends replacing the current "one -vote veto system" with "specific majority".

Feng Delin, the chairman of the European Commission, also said that if the European Union wants to speed up its actions, in the key European Union policy field, the full voting system will no longer make any significance.

The European Parliament has recently passed a resolution with a majority of votes that require the European Council to start a process of modifying the EU Treaty and change the "one -vote veto system for member states" to a "minority obedience to the majority" system to ensure the effectiveness of EU decisions.

At present, 13 EU member states have clearly opposed the revision of the Alliance. Leaders of Hungary, Poland, and Denmark believe that doing so will weaken their right to speak, and the EU major decision -making will gradually evolve into "big powers."

We all know that at the beginning of the EU's establishment, in order to reflect the equal values ​​of European traditions and attract more small and medium member states, the principle of "unanimous consent of all member states of major bills" was established, which is actually a "one -vote veto system." But after that, the "one -vote veto system" has always been troubled by the EU's daily operating mechanism.

As a member of the EU member, the United Kingdom has long disrupted EU affairs with a veto power for a long time, and has obtained many Britain's own interests. Hungary, Poland and other Eastern European countries have also repeatedly rejected the EU's proposal in immigrants, finances, sanctions Russia, and even accusing China in multiple proposals.

Although the leaders of European countries such as the European Union and Germany and France, although they are quite angry about this, they are reluctant to be helpless because of the "one -vote veto system".

NATO Group has also been plagued by the "one -vote veto system" for many years. The most obvious example is that Turkey has repeatedly exercised vetoly to resist NATO headquarters. Especially in the recent joining of NATO in Sweden and Finland, Turkey uses "one vote veto" as a threat and bargain with NATO headquarters. Although the relevant parties reached an agreement on the eve of the NATO Summit of Madrid, Turkey still stated that if Sweden and Finland do not perform their commitments to transfer to Kurdish political prisoners, the Turkish parliament can still veto and block the last hope of Sweden and Finland to join NATO.

This time the EU leaders and the European Parliament have successively stated that they have revised the "one -vote veto system". "One -vote veto" has officially put on the agenda. Although it will be opposed and resisted by Eastern Europe and even small and medium -sized member countries in Eastern Europe, it is imperative to replace the "one -vote veto system" with "a minority to obey the majority".

Once the "one -vote veto" is banned, it will be more smooth and easier to pass the EU through major bills, but in fact it means that the voice of individual "thorny" countries within the EU will be "shielded", which may lead to representing Germany. The European Union, such as the will of the European powers, will have the phenomenon of "alliance bullying". Therefore, large powers can "group gangs" gather small groups, and small countries with different opinions and dare to speak or dare to speak. "Sound and exclude", which also violates the principle of equality that Europe has always advocated.

Source: Phoenix Satellite TV Yan Mingzhi Paris Report

Edit: Wang Erya

- END -