How to deal with the relationship between the "red code" of the learning 丨?

Zhejiang News Client finishing Zhang Xin

On June 13, some netizens feedback on the social platform that many storage households who went to Zhengzhou to communicate villages and towns were "red code", and many storage households who did not go to Zhengzhou were given "red code".

The "precision" of the "precision" of the storage households who safeguarded rights and interests were "red code", and the incident quickly attracted widespread attention. The original intention of the health code is to provide precise and intelligent control for the prevention and control of the epidemic, but when it is "binding" with our daily life, it must be more bounded.

Any technology has two sides. How to make technology really use it? This is a subject that must be responded in the era of science and technology. In this issue, we have collected the views of relevant experts and talked about the relationship between people and technology.

Keep the ethical bottom line

Historically, the progress of science and technology may be accompanied by certain ethical risks. In 1920, Little Albert's psychological experiments triggered a storm of public opinion; the gene -editing infant incident in the past few years shocked the scientific community and social public opinion ...

The science and technology of tools, whether good or evil depends on the user itself, requires inventors and users to do good at good and keep the ethical bottom line. Not long ago, the General Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the General Office of the State Council issued the "Opinions on Strengthening the Governance of Scientific and Technological Ethics" (hereinafter referred to as "Opinions"). Plan the blueprint.

The "Opinions" clarifies the five basic principles of strengthening scientific and technological ethics. "Ethics" is the primary principle, that is, to promote the entire process of scientific and technological ethics requirements throughout scientific and technological activities. Yao Xinzhong, a professor at the School of Philosophy of Renmin University of China, believes that scientific and technological ethics cannot be simply understood as the opposition between ethics and technology. It is necessary to establish a correct concept of scientific and technological ethical governance, and place scientific and technological development and ethics in the interactive relationship between tradition and modernization. In short, advocating scientific and technological ethical governance is not only a requirement for scientific and technological progress, but also the expectations of ethical and moral innovation development.

So, what is the effect of keeping the ethical bottom line on the development of science and technology? According to Ouyang Kang, the president of the National Institute of Governance of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, the role of scientific and technological ethics in science and technology can be roughly divided into three levels. Set the value goal, motivate scientific and technological progress, and guide scientific and technological progress to the correct direction and road that is conducive to the progress of human civilization; followed by the role of the rules. Set up behavioral standards, standardize scientific research behaviors, and standardize scientific and technological activities on the rails and interval of scientific, reasonable and standardized, and healthy, and then have punishment. Set up a moral bottom line to warn, criticize and punish the use of scientific and technological activities and its achievements to harm humans, and prevent and resolve possible risks.

Please enter the picture description

Development and governance parallel

The bottom line of ethics is the basic criterion for achieving science and technology, but this does not mean that scientific and technological innovation must give concessions to ethical governance. Contemporary scientific and technological activities must realize the common evolution of scientific and technological innovation and scientific and technological ethics.

Duan Weiwen, director of the Science and Technology and Social Research Center of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, pointed out that with the emergence of emerging technologies such as genes, nanomaterials, artificial intelligence, virtual reality, and neurotic technology, scientific and technological personnel, scientific and technological managers, and the public gradually form a consensus. The relationship between scientific and technological innovation and scientific and technological ethics to "parallel" relationship must not only consider its value ethics issues at the beginning of scientific and technological innovation, but also make scientific and technological ethics a feedback and adjustment that runs through the full life cycle of scientific and technological innovation. mechanism.

Facing the value ethics challenges of emerging technology, it is difficult to cope with the ethical risks of scientific and technological innovation alone by scientific research ethics and professional ethics of science and technology communities, build a sound scientific and technological ethical standard system, and carry out more foreseeable, dynamic and extensive participation scientific and technological ethics ethics. Evaluate.

Zhang Yaping, deputy dean of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, suggested that scientific and technological ethical governance should prevent generalization and politicalization of ethics, to avoid restricting scientific and technological development with the ethics and specifications of abstract dogma, and to be reasonably developed with scientific and technological innovation. In the long run, the development trend of all human society is unstoppable, and the ethics of scientific and technological ethics has continued to evolve. Therefore, it is necessary to prevent generalization of ethical issues and hinders or restrict cutting -edge scientific and technological activities with the banner or guise of scientific and technological ethics, causing scientific researchers to be awesome and scientific and technological innovation.

(This article is integrated from the People's Daily, Study Times, Zhejiang Daily, etc.)

- END -