Guizhou donkeys are poor!He has no noise to "mines" against China

Taiwan's "China Times" on July 18th, the original title: the US military mines and fighting, the Guizhou donkey skills are poor.

The U.S. Navy's Lieutenant Colonel Dinuo suggested that once the US and China war, the Indo -Pacific Command can perform "offensive Bre" in the Yellow Sea and the Pearl River Delta. In addition to exchanging the time and space of the US military's deployment counterattack, it can also hit the Chinese economy. The reason why this is worthy of attention is that in addition to the above functions of the mines, the transparency of the battlefield is increasingly unable to support the disadvantages of the U.S. military in the Indo -Pacific battlefield, because a single weapon (mine) cannot change the disadvantages of the US military.

U.S. experts have no noise in the Yellow Sea and the Pearl River Delta Bre, in order to force the mainland to negotiate when the two sides broke out. The picture shows the data photo of the US military airdrop mines.

Water warfare can be divided into offensive and defensive mines: Labs in the enemy's waters to set up mines is an offensive mines and mines in their own control seas to control the sea. Lightning sweeping and Brey are two sides. How many minesweeper means there are the same ways of Brey; now they can even implement Brey in the long distance. This is trapped in the dead alley of the "spear and shield" competition. Although the U.S. military can also be in the waters of China, China can also be on the west coast, Hawaii, and Guam of the United States!

Undoubtedly, the United States has the world's strongest motto combat capabilities. But the Liberation Army fighter and missiles generally exceeded 1,000 kilometers. The overall mines of the People's Liberation Army are not weaker than the US Navy. The Liberation Army Navy's mine is mainly based on traditional sweeping larviac ships, airdrops, and underwater Brahite. In recent years, it is absolutely okay to add missiles to the west coast of the United States. Therefore, when the U.S. Navy is self -contained in Brey near China, I am afraid that the PLA has to pay attention to how the PLA is near the United States.

The reconnaissance capacity of the two countries is even more world -class. It is difficult for the U.S. military to fly to China to cast mines from offshore. The ability of the United States and China to master the transparency of the battlefield is very strong. In fact, the competition between the two sides is not ability, but an attempt. In this case, it is impossible for the U.S. forces to be like a sneak attack in the past. If the U.S. military really does this, it will only cause the PLA to counter -anticipation.

Since the emergence of "smart weapons", the war has become more and more open and transparent. In particular, the ability of "mutual learning" between the United States and China forces has continued to enhance, and it is increasingly impossible for opponents to secretly use certain weapons under modern detection capabilities, such as mines.

The advantages of the U.S. military in the Western Pacific region are obvious. For example, the three island chains are restricted by China, but their military disadvantages are even more prominent. Because the United States and mainland China do not connect at all, this limits the intensity and breadth of competition in the United States and China, and the two sides can only develop in the direction of sea and air. This is why the recent distributed operations or watershed warfare (saying) are widely popular. Think about it, under the operation of the PLA region, under the operation of the operation, the US naval aircraft carrier formation can hardly enter 1,000 kilometers of waters during the war. Only unmanned weapons. On the surface, it looks lively and extraordinary dispersion or mines. It shows that the US military and Guizhou donkeys have poor skills and gradually lose the initiative of the Asia -Pacific battlefield. At least it can no longer operate the "artillery ship policy".

Source: In -depth Observation/Author is Tan Chuanyi, a researcher at the Taiwan International Strategic Society

- END -