Social Comment: International Criminal Court should investigate the crime of the British massacre

The "appalling" behavior sent by the Britain as a criminal as a criminal was stopped by the European Human Rights Court for less than a month, and another more "appalling" crime was exposed by Britain's own media. According to the BBC and other media recently reported, members of the British "Special Electric Qin" in Afghanistan have repeatedly killed prisoners of war and unparalleled civilians, and even launched a "murderer competition". As many as 54 Afghanians were illegally killed. In addition, the relevant troops were suspected of forging the scene. The former commander of the British special forces did not report. Later, he was promoted to Chief of Staff of the British Army. He just stepped down last month.

However, the attention caused by this breaking news in the Western public opinion field is not consistent with the seriousness of its content. The United States and Western public opinion, which always likes small topics, generally shows the indifferent attitude of "big questions and small things". Related reports have not been formed, and they quickly cool down, and they are covered by other topics alone in British politics. Faced with the allegations of such brutal and bad behaviors about the British army, the attitude of the British Ministry of Defense is almost perfunctory. On weekdays, the British Congress and politicians who like to talk about human rights do not see any of them stand up and stretch for the innocent Afghan victims. justice. There are only a few condemnations like routine business, and it sounds so weak.

Overseas slaughter cannot be allowed by any civilized country, and it is also a cruel trample on international morality and law. No British party or politician dares to endorse this "stain" that the British army is accused, but they have no enthusiasm and motivation to truly promote investigation and accountability for it. It is okay to do it. Therefore, people have reasons to worry that the final result of this incident may be left. The British Department of Defense claims to conduct a wide range of investigations on British soldiers in Afghanistan and Iraq, but in fact at least 90%of war crimes are accused of not being investigated. In the final analysis, it is impossible for us to expect the British self -correction.

A spokesman for the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs said on the 18th that the international community conducted a thorough investigation of the crimes of war in Britain and the United States and infringement of human rights. It also gave the innocent life justice, so that people from all countries no longer suffered arbitrarily bullying and harm. This appeal is very necessary, hoping to resonate enough in the international community and promote the implementation of the investigation operation.

The International Criminal Court should immediately investigate Britain and the United States and the Australian troops in Afghanistan. The International Criminal Court has launched an investigation in Afghanistan, but so far it is mainly targeted at the Taliban. A survey of the United States has no following after being posted by Trump. It is difficult to not criticize this is a "dual standard". The International Criminal Court needs to promote judicial justice through more independent, objective and fair judicial activities, and win general trust in various countries. A survey of the British "massacre incident" was a tester.

There are actually a thousand when I found a cockroach, which is common sense of life. The associate spokesperson for the interim government in Afghanistan said that the NATO army's abuse in Africa was far more serious than public reports. Prior to the British, the U.S. and the Australian troops were also exploded to kill civilians in Afghanistan. Various facts show that these are not isolated cases, but a common phenomenon of long -term and systematic existence.

Let's take a look at it, it is precisely the three "five -eye alliances" countries in Britain and the United States and Australia. At the same time, the three countries that are the most powerful for other countries to wield human rights sticks are the most vicious people who have harmed human rights overseas. This is of course not coincidence, but in the inner dark logic. What is even worse is that the three countries have established a free system for themselves. The British Parliament promoted the "Overseas Act Act" last year to cover British soldiers who have committed serious crimes such as torture overseas. Washington sanctions on officials of international criminal courts who tried to investigate the crime of U.S. war, and prevented the investigation in this simple and rude way.

As long as the perpetrators cannot be punished, the occurrence of a crime together is inevitable. This kind of shuddering situation in Britain and America should have painted a sentence.