Overseas online reviews: strong push nuclear sewage to discharge the sea, Japan hurts others

Data Map: Before the official residence of the Prime Minister of Japan, the Japanese people who protested the nuclear pollution of water (Figure/Xinhua News Agency)

Matsuni Matsno Matsuni, the official room of the cabinet, went to the Fukushima First Nuclear Power Station from July 15th to 16th from July 15th to 16th, and asked Tokyo Electric Power Company, an operator of the nuclear power plant to work hard to promote the process of nuclear pollution water. In addition, Dongdian Corporation recently stated that the submarine mining work of the "discharge port" of Fukushima First Nuclear Power Station has been basically completed. The Japanese side forcibly promoting the construction of nuclear polluting water to discharge the sea, trying to cause the established facts to be extremely irresponsible, and eventually it will only harm others.

The Fukushima First Nuclear Power Station accident in 2011 is one of the worst nuclear accidents in the world to date. The accident caused a large amount of radioactive substances, which had a profound impact on marine ecological environment, food safety and human health. The Japanese government is preparing to discharge nuclear pollution water discharged to the Pacific Ocean next spring, and has been exposed to the melted nuclear fuel melted by the Fukushima first nuclear power plant. The radioactive substances contain are extremely complicated. In the end, it will spread to the world, and it will deeply affect the marine ecological environment, and the potential destruction of global fishery resources and human health and well -being cannot be estimated.

It is because nuclear pollution water will cause many potential risks to the world after the ocean discharge of nuclear pollution water. Therefore, nuclear pollution water is never a private matter in Japan, but it is related to the vital interests of many people, including the Japanese people, and the global marine ecology. Environmental events. Since more than a year ago, the Japanese government made a decision to drain nuclear pollution water, the questioning and opposition of people from all over the Pacific and domestic people have not stopped. For example, the documents released by the Foreign Minister of the Pacific Island Forum mentioned a few days ago mentioned that Japan discharged nuclear pollution water to the ocean. Foreign ministers reiterated that "Japan may have a cross -generation impact to the ocean discharge of nuclear pollution water to the ocean, and the people of the Pacific Island country have great concern to this." Essence However, it is regrettable that the Japanese government has not made a scientific and credible explanation on key issues such as the reliability of nuclear pollution water data, the effectiveness of the purification device, and the uncertainty of the environmental impact of nuclear pollution water for more than a year. Promoting the approval of the nuclear pollution water discharge scheme and the launch of the construction of the sea -sea engineering project is extremely irresponsible for international concerns and domestic public opinion.

While not obtaining the wide understanding of neighboring countries and the international community, the Japanese government has continued to decorate its own mistakes to decide on its own mistakes to reverse negative public opinion. In fact, on the problem of nuclear pollution water, at least 5 kinds of schemes including steam discharge and underground burial, while the Japanese government chose the "shortest time and the least expense" programs, which indicates that the Japanese government is dealing with processing On the issue of nuclear pollution water, the first thing to think of is not how to avoid and reduce the destruction of the health and well -being of all human beings and the global marine ecological environment, but how to minimize its own burden and how to "spend less money and do big things". After making an error decision, the Japanese government not only failed to face domestic and foreign opposition to public opinion and follow the good, but tried to mislead the public. It is either the billions of budgets used to "eliminate the negative image of the Fukushima first nuclear power plant accident", or to launch the "mascot" to decorate the fault.

Nowadays, what Japan really needs to do is not to make excuses to decide the decoration of the error for nuclear pollution water to discharge the sea, nor to forcibly promote the relevant process of nuclear pollution water discharge. The error of the water discharge is decided to deal with nuclear pollution water in an open, transparent, scientific, and safe manner. If Japan insists on promoting nuclear pollution water, it will not only help its own international reputation, but also push itself to the situation that endangers the health and well -being of human beings and the global marine ecological environment. Japan should think about it and be cautious. (Chen Yang)

- END -