During the trial, he said, "If you want to be punished,", and the result ...

"I made an inconsistent statement before and after the court yesterday. I denied the IOU issued in court. This is all I don't understand the law. Today, after the court's integrity education, I have realized my mistakes ..."

This is the content of a regret book written by a parties in the People's Court of Lucheng District, Wenzhou. During the trial of a non -governmental loan dispute, the defendant Xiao Yao was fined 500 yuan for inconsistent statements before and after the court.

In May 2017, the uncle of Wenzhou Civil Zhang commissioned the car repair master Xiao Yao to sell a private car. After selling the car, Xiao Yao delayed it to sell the car for 15,000 yuan, and said that his capital turnover was difficult. IOU. After the IOU was issued, Xiao Yao pushed for various reasons. On June 6 this year, Uncle Zhang sued Xiao Yao to Lucheng Court and asked to repay the loan 15,000 yuan and compensate the interest loss.

During the trial, Xiao Yao denied the lack of herself, and then denied it, and the statement was inconsistent, saying that she had previously acknowledged a false statement of the underwriting. The judge informed Xiao Yao that the false statement would face the legal consequences, and Xiao Yao had not realized the seriousness.

"The defendant may not know what legal consequences will have a murderous words." The next day after the trial, the undertaking judge contacted Xiao Yao to talk and took him to visit the court's integrity lawsuit to advocate the community, carefully explain the lawsuit, the legal provisions of false statements and the typical typical statements of false statements, and typical typical statements. Case.

After walking down, Xiao Yao realized his mistakes, his attitude changed significantly. Without the trial, he was determined to say that "punishment would be punished". It is hoped that the courts will organize the mediation and do their best to repay.

Subsequently, the uncle of the judges conveyed the intention of Xiao Yao and passed the online service of the people's court, which eventually contributed to the reconciliation of the two parties. Xiao Yao said on the reconciliation transcript and said, "Thanks to the court and the judge, I will definitely perform the payment obligations in accordance with the settlement agreement."

The court believes that although the defendant has issued a regretful book, Xiao Yao made an unreal statement in the trial, which has hindered the impartial trial of the people's court and should be sanctioned according to law. In accordance with the "Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on the evidence of civil litigation", as well as the civil proceedings law, combined with the amount of the case, it was decided to fined 500 yuan for Xiao Yao. At present, Xiao Yao has paid a fine.

The judge reminded that the integrity lawsuit is the basic requirement of the civil proceedings to participate in civil lawsuits, and it is also the right meaning of ensuring fairness and fairness of judicial fairness. The parties' dishonest behaviors such as false statements, falsification of evidence, and tampering with contracts not only infringe on the legitimate rights and interests of others, but also increase the difficulty of court trials, and also waste judicial resources and damage judicial credibility.

It is reported that in May 2021, the Lucheng Court took the lead in establishing an integrity lawsuit and a special education mechanism, and created an education zone. Fortunately, 2431 people have been educated so far.

Source: Zhejiang Legal System Daily (correspondent Lu Xuan)

- END -