Cover comments 丨 strictly handle the "raincoat man" case, the "background of marriage history" should not affect the identification of evil viciousness

□ Jiang Yanzheng

On the evening of July 11, the video of "mother and daughter upstairs was dragged into the room by a raincoat man". On the 12th, the police in Laiyang, Shandong, responded that the adult men and women in the video had just divorced, and the two had contradictions after the divorce. The man involved was detained by the police, and the dragged adults and children were not uptake. The police report revealed that the suspect Zhan Moumou had a relationship with the victim Jiang Moumou. At 18:00 on July 6, Zhanmou was waiting for the opportunity to drag his mother and daughter to the room, entangled Jiang Moumou with them with them. Remove. At 22:00 on July 6, Zhanmou forcibly had sex with Jiang Moumou. On July 11, Zhan Moumou was arrested and brought to justice. (Surging News)

Wearing a raincoat and scary weird, forcibly dragging the mother and daughter into the house. This circulating video is full of barbaric violence, making people shudder. As a result, netizens naturally can't help but worry. As the police disclosed the relevant information one after another, the ins and outs of the matter have been roughly surfaced. The initiator Zhan Moumou has been caught, and the mother and daughter of the victims are also clear. It should be said that compared to the possibilities such as "no different differences" or "revenge" that some people have speculated before, the case of this case is much simpler. But even if the "divorce dispute" and "acquaintance committed the crime", the evil behavior and malignant of the suspects are still terrible.

This case has aroused great attention and heated discussions on public opinion, which began to discuss the facts of the case, and then diverged to some derived "peripheral issues". For example, many netizens have objections to some of the words used by related parties. Police responded that "the dragged adults and children are not a big deal." Many people questioned that "this is the case, how can it not be a big deal?" Obviously, the former is based on the "injury appraisal" from the perspective In terms of "physical and mental damage" at the level of cognitive. In addition, some people worry that the so -called "forced relationship" in the notification will vague the essence of "rape", but this is actually wrong.

It should be noted that the police said in an interview in a subsequent interview that "the man was temporarily investigated the crime of illegally invasion of the house and rape." In this regard, there is no intention of trying to avoid the crimes of light and dilute the crime. Of course, the high degree of sensitivity and even the words of the public in this matter are actually understandable and goodwill. What it corresponds is undoubtedly the fact that in our social context, family affairs are often not fully protected by mud and women's rights. Seeing more "family violence" is regarded as "emotional disputes", and in the language of "rape in marriage", there are very few jurisprudence, the public will inevitably "give up one against three", similar associations, and then generate a neurological reflection type. The stress reaction.

Never let go of a bad guy, and never tolerate the "big event" to make the criminals from crime or light punishment. This is the simple view of justice. The police reported the case and introduced that the cause and consequences would naturally involve the marriage history of the two, but the subsequent investigation, public prosecution and judgment of this case can be simplified, that is, the origin of the two "originally husband and wife and later divorce". Together with major criminal cases together. With both divorce, the two have nothing to do. Under this framework, the evidence collection and conviction of "illegal invasion of residential" and "rape" can be grasped by the core, and the single knife can be directly punished with a good use of legal tools.

Marriage is not a shelter for crimes, and the "ex -husband" identity is not the amulet of the "thug". The case in accordance with the law and strictly handling the "raincoat man" is not only an inevitable choice for women's rights to stretch the rights and interests of women, but also to promote the treatment of citizens to protect the rights of citizens and defend public order.

- END -