The brand worn by Tangshan's beating man was accepted by the Internet, and the response came.

Recently, the incident of hitting people in the Tangshan barbecue restaurant in Hebei has continued to attract public opinion. Some of the people involved were wearing Boy London short sleeves. Later, a picture of "away from such people" was widely spread, and this brand of clothing also encountered "Internet storms". Some netizens went to this brand live broadcast room to attack messages: "Shou Yi" and "Bully" and other words, the female anchor was crying.

The brand wearing a man (picture source: video screenshot)

Boy London's official Weibo also poured into a ridiculous message similar to "I can't look directly at the big gold wings in the future". Many netizens have published related comments such as "Don't Play with this brand". In addition, some of the brands of fans have begun to abandon the clothes they bought before, and some netizens said: "Too much rhythm."

At the same time, a picture of "away from such wearing crowds" is popular on the Internet. In the picture, the man wore a Boy London black top and a big gold chain.

The picture of "Stay away from this kind of wearing crowd" (picture source: network)

On the 13th, the brand responded to resolutely resist violence. Some lawyers believe that netizens should not "label" the brand. If the remarks have damaged the brand's business reputation and commodity reputation, it belongs to civil infringement.

Tmall flagship store automatically responds to screenshots

Attorney Chai Xin of Beijing Dacheng (Wuhan) Law Firm believes that the "BOY LONDON" brand has not participated in the case of Tangshan involved, nor does it not make improper remarks to support violent attacks. Netizens should not "label" the "Boy London" brand "label" the brand. Essence A small number of netizens published remarks such as "Through the Boy London's clothes" and "Do not play with people who wearing this brand". Commercial reputation and commodity reputation belong to civil infringement. "The brand can sue the suspected infringement, asking them to bear the legal liability of stopping infringement, restoration of reputation, eliminating impact, apology, compensation, etc.". "

"People sit at home, and the pot comes from heaven." This "cyber storm" also extended to some irrelevant people and things. For example, someone showed the name and address of the hot pot restaurant that the beating person had run, and instigated netizens to "engage in activities" on the scene. But in fact, this shop has long been transferred. Today's owner is unbearable and has to close the shop overnight.

The owner dismantled the signature store overnight. The screenshot comes from the current owner's short video account

For another example, some people question the cowardice of the bystanders and the "absence" of the owner of the barbecue restaurant. Lu seeing the unhelp can come forward, of course, it is worthy of respect, but it should not be required to do it. When you think about it, when you encounter a group of poor mobs, the prevention of ordinary people may not play a role, and timely alarm is a practical choice.

The owner of the barbecue restaurant involved speaks

In the face of this malignant incident, everyone can express anger and call for justice, but they must not give the relevant personnel "cyber storms" regardless of the name of justice, and then create secondary disasters. The power of justice is a light that requires everyone to guard. The "cyber storm" that breaks through the bottom line of the law and morality just cracks down on the kindness and social justice in people's hearts. Riking atrocities is good for justice. But the fuzzy focus, the wrong target, no.

(Source: CCTV, Jiupai News, Red Star News, Workers Daily, Qianjiang Evening News)

Edit: Ren Shiyin Hu Kaiyu

- END -