death penalty!Yunnan Wenshan billionaire was sentenced to the first instance after being reviewed by the killing case

The case of "Yunnan billionaire was killed" has made the latest progress.

On November 30, 2020, the defendant Ma Shoucong's crime of intentional homicide in the Wenshan Prefecture Intermediate People's Court of Yunnan Province and made (2019) Yun 26 Criminal Criminal Criminal Determine. , Exclude political rights for life. Ma Shoucong appealed to the High Court of Yunnan Province in the first instance. Yunnan Provincial High Court issued a second instance criminal ruling on November 26, 2021: The first instance judgment was determined that the facts were unclear and the evidence was insufficient. Essence

On the morning of July 8, 2022, the Wenshan Intermediate People's Court made the first trial judgment after the trial of the case: the defendant Ma Shoucong committed intentional homicide, sentenced to death, and deprived of political rights for life.

Billionaires were stabbed at their doorstep

On August 7, 2018, Wang Huacong, a well -known "billionaire" in Wenshan Prefecture, Yunnan, was killed after being injured by a car at his own door.

After the murderer, Ma Shoucong, called the police and surrendered. After being identified by the Forensic Appraisal Center of Laoshan County, Wang Huatong died of acute blood loss shock.

The prosecution of the case has extended the review period of the review three times, returned to supplementary investigations twice, and eventually sued Ma Shoucong with intentional homicide.

The public prosecution agency's indictment stated that the defendant Ma Shoucong and his brother Ma Shouxing joined An Rui Company, which was under the control of the victim Wang Huacong. The two sides had economic disputes and failed to resolve it for many years. After learning that the victim, Wang Huacong could not pay back the money, the defendant Ma Shancong had the idea of ​​killing Wang Huacong.

The Wenshan Intermediate Court tried that Ma Shoucong deliberately deprived of the lives of others' lives and constituted the crime of intentional homicide.

After the first trial was pronounced, Ma Shoucong appealed to the Yunnan Provincial High Court. After the trial of the Provincial High Court, he ruled that he returned to the Wenshan Intermediate People's Court for review.

Family members think they are hiring murders

The family members of the victim and their agents proposed that the case cannot exclude Ma Shoucong's opinion of being instructed by others or hiring murder. After investigation, there was economic disputes between Wang Huatong and Ma Shoucong's brother Ma Shouxing. The evidence of the case could confirm that Ma Shouxing was hospitalized after being injured by Wang Huacong's disputes with Wang Huacong, indicating that there was indeed contradiction between Ma Shouxing and Wang Huacong.

On the day of the incident, Ma Shoucong had a number of calls with Ma Shouxing in the process of following Wang Huacong. Witnesses Ma confirmed that when he was on Ma Shoucong's car, Ma Shoucong answered the phone and called, and heard Ma Shoucong informed the other party at the time. Ma Shoucong also confessed that he called Ma Shouxing. He reported to Ma Shouxing's position to Wang Huacong, and asked Ma Shouxing to come to Wang Huacong to ask for money.

Ma Shouxing only admitted that there was a call with Ma Shoucong. He confirmed that Ma Shoucong called him, and he called Ma Shoucong again. He called Ma Shoucong to help his house to help the iron wire. Ma Shouxing did not know that Ma Shoucong followed and premeditated to kill Wang Huacong.

Lawyer defense: there are economic disputes between the two

Although Ma Shouxing led his family to Kunming after the incident, the evidence in the case could not confirm that Ma Shoucong's crime was instructed by Ma Shouxing. Ma Shoucong used to be a drug abuse person. He is now in his 40s and is still alone. His "heard the news that Ma Shouxing said that Wang Huatong did not give money when working in Jiujiang, Jiangxi, and the confession of killing Wang Huatong" was partially objective. And authenticity. Therefore, the evidence of the case cannot confirm that Ma Shoucong was instructed by others to commit crimes, or others hired a crime.

Regarding Ma Shoucong's defender to propose a defense opinion of the victim Wang Huacong's fault, by the Wenshan Intermediate People's Court, Ma Shouxing and Ma Shancong's parents confirmed that in 2003, Ma Shoucong's parents had contributed 500,000 to the part of Ma Shoucong's part of Ma Shouxing's shares in Anrui Company's shares. Purchase. However, from the fact that the facts are found, the share is not the shareholders of Anrui. The existing evidence can only determine that Ma Shoucong's brother Ma Shouxing is the shareholder of Anrui. During its operational period, the operating situation was not announced and no dividends were performed. Ma Shouxing and the victim Wang Huacong had had disputes due to the company's operation.

Wenshan Intermediate People's Court believes that the dispute has nothing to do with Ma Shoucong, and economic disputes should be resolved through legal procedures. Even if Ma Shoucong believes that there is economic dispute between Wang Huacong and it, it cannot be the reason for him to kill Wang Huatong. No fault. The defense opinions made by the defender will not be adopted.

Judgment of the first instance: The death penalty was sentenced to intentional homicide

After reviewing the Wen Shan Middle Court, Ma Shoucong took the initiative to invest in the crime and truthfully confess the criminal facts, and has the first plot.

On the day of the incident, Ma Shoucong was waiting for the crime in front of the victim's house, which was a premeditated murderer; Ma Shoucong drove to Wang Huatong's vehicle. After Wang Huatong was injured, he stabbed Wang Huacong with a dagger, causing Wang Huatong to die. Essence According to Ma Shoucong's nature and plot in crime, although he has the first plot, he is not enough to punish him lightly.

As a result, the Wenshan Intermediate People's Court made a first trial judgment: Ma Shoucong committed the crime of intentional homicide, sentenced to death, and deprived of political rights for life; and compensated the family members of the victims to lose more than 60,000 yuan, a dagger for the case, and confiscated according to law.

Spring City Evening News-Kaiping Journalist Bai Licheng

- END -