The domestic violence man flew the child and could not "close the door to solve"

On June 30, someone posted a family surveillance video on Weibo, saying that "the young child is speechless." The video showed that at 16:14 that day, a man beaten and kicked the child indoors. After the child was kicked, he chased and kicked. The family came to stop and the two sides pulled. At 16:19, the man was sitting on the sofa, suddenly stunned, kicked the child, and shouted "Lao Tzu with a knife" and ran to the kitchen. A older woman stepped forward to stop, her wife then held her child Painting.

Soon, in the video, the man's heartbroken child was hurting the child, and his shuddered "Declaration of the Sword", which stirred strong public anger on the Internet. At the same time as condemnation, many netizens have asked about the details after the incident. On July 1, the Beilun Branch of the Ningbo Public Security Bureau issued a police report. After an initial investigation, the incident occurred in the bureau's jurisdiction. In the video, the man Dong Mou had an emotional control of his child. Investigation and evidence collection work is undergoing. After inspection by the hospital, the child's physical condition was normal, and the district women's federation had participated in the disposal and condolences.

Looking at the children who were kicked and even kicked in the video, it was hard to be heartbroken. Those who have strong empathy or have the shadow of domestic violence can even feel the fear across the screen. For netizens who are concerned about this, this is just a angry social news, but for the children, children's mother, and older women in the video, this is a severe danger related to personal safety. territory. Considering that Dong's phrase "Lao Tzu takes a knife", even if he uses "escape in the dead" to describe their encounters, I am afraid it is not too exaggerated.

In the report, the police mentioned that the cause of the incident was that Dong and his wife had contradictions due to family chores, and then furled on the child's head. However, whether it is the police handling the case or the general public judging the matter, it must not be missed by the words "family trivial affairs", thinking that this "housework" is thought. Despite the consequences, the physical condition of being beaten is normal, and Dong's behavior may not reach the level of crime. However, in terms of behavior, its atrocities are enough to show how dangerous Dong is.

The relationship between family members is of course closer than strangers. However, this heavy intimate will only allow family members to have more legal and moral obligations between each other, and to give them additional "tolerance space" when one of them is harsh behaviors such as domestic violence. In essence, the behavior of Dong family's violent children was not decisive with his non -relatives. Adults have broken through the bottom line of social rules no matter what the reason for the young children. Not to mention that Dong's behavior has made his wife intolerable, and he chose to call the police. Even if his family finally "forgives" him, this behavior should not be condoned by law and social morality.

Dong is the child's father's dad, but it does not become a reason to reduce the responsibility, but it is even more worrying. Dong's wife and children have to get along with such a person who cannot control emotions and may use extreme violence every day, so that their danger is doubled. From this perspective, the relevant departments should also carefully judge that whether such people can still have a complete monitoring right to their children. In addition, if his wife then divorced because of his family atrocities, the relevant departments should also support it rather than obstruct, thereby ensuring the safety of his family early.

In the face of loved ones, normal people should have deeper feelings. "Emotional out of control" is not an excuse for violence, and relative relationships are not "gold medals" for sin exemption. In addition to this, in addition to investigating the liability of domestic violence in accordance with the law, the relevant departments should also implement the system of deprivation of monitoring such as guardianship and other systems, and rescue the threatened children from the shadow of violence.

Although the relevant system of custody qualifications was written into laws as early as 1986, the first case of the first case of the Civil Affairs Department applied for the elimination of parental guardian qualifications until 2015. To this day, there are not many cases of guardianships in the country. In this regard, the relevant departments also need to establish a full -process protection chain of the deprivation of monitoring rights. On the one hand, the relevant system "grows its teeth". On the one hand, after the subsequent plan is made to prevent the parents from being deprived of the guardianship, the child falls into the "no one cares" The situation. Family violence is a social problem. It cannot be solved by "close the door to the door." At the same time, a sound monitoring management system also needs to work together.

Article/Yang Xinyu

Edit/Huang Shuai

- END -