The woman went to the colleague's house to pick pears and was injured, claiming 130,000 yuan!Court: "Family benefits, so rejection of demands"

Colleagues picking pears in their own house,

However, an accident was injured by the pear,

Who should be responsible for this,

Related topics also topped the hot search list.

Let's look at it together

My colleague's house was injured

recently,

Ms. Liu, Changsha, Hunan, to pick pear in the orchard of Mr. Li's house,

Because they did not say hello in advance,

Mr. Li was not there that day.

Ms. Huang's wife, Ms. Huang enthusiastically received Ms. Liu,

And took the initiative to take out the bamboo cricket to help Ms. Liu go to the orchard to fight pear.

After Ms. Liu picked up the drop of pear,

A pear suddenly dropped on the tree,

It happened to be smashed on Ms. Liu's left eye.

After returning home,

Ms. Liu feels her left eye is getting more and more painful,

After more than 20 days of the incident, I went to the hospital for treatment.

Being diagnosed with eyeballs, choroidal rupture,

Symptoms such as chronic purulent otitis media in the left ear,

I have been hospitalized for 15 days,

The cost of treatment is more than 10,000 yuan.

Appraisal display,

Ms. Liu's left eye injury is currently left with moderate vision damage,

Reliable to level 10 disability.

After negotiation with Mr. Li's compensation failed,

Ms. Liu brought Mr. Li to the court,

The claim ordered Mr. Li to compensate for various losses,

A total of more than 130,000 yuan.

How to judge the court

The court trial believes that the behavior of Ms. Liu's wife asked Ms. Liu to use bamboo crickets to kill her pears and gifts. The rights and obligations of the rights or agreed between the two parties. As a person who has a capable capacity for a complete civil behavior, Ms. Liu should have fully recognized the danger caused by the drop of pears and prevent it. Therefore, Ms. Liu's injury did not have causal relationships in the sense of infringement liability, and did not have any faults for the facts of damage, and should not bear the infringement liability.

"Good intentions Shi Hui is a good behavior, which has carried forward a good morality and demonstrated the core values ​​of socialism. In the case of no intentional or major negligence, the good people are required to bear compensation for the loss of beneficiaries. Responsibility should not be supported by the law. "The judge of the trial stated that Ms. Liu's falling pear was injured. It was an unexpected event. It is not good for the good owner to bear the liability for compensation for his damage. Inheriting morality, it is not supported.

Then he decided to reject Ms. Liu's entire claims.

The court's judgment was also praised by netizens

remind:

Nowadays, the season when the fruits are mature,

Whether you go to your own garden or pick up melon fruit elsewhere,

Pay attention to safety,

Avoid accidental damage.

not

Recommended in the future

not

not

Source: Shanxi Evening News All -Media Comprehensive

- END -