250 million deposits are "disappeared", and the prosecutor's announcement of the Guangxi Banking Regulatory Bureau's case selection was sentenced

Jimu Journalist Zhao Delong

Video editing Zhao Delong

On the morning of June 30, in the incident of 250 million deposits in Nanning Branch of Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, Ms. Reserve Duan sued the Case of Guangxi Regulatory Bureau of the Bank of China Insurance Supervision and Administration of the Bank of China to open the trial in the Second Trial Court of the Nanning Railway Transport Court. Trial. Jimu Journalists learned from Ms. Duan that the case was not pronounced in court and will be pronounced on a regular basis.

In 2019, a number of reserved households deposited a large amount of funds in the high interest rate of Liang Jianhong, a staff member of the Nanning Branch of China Industrial and Commercial Bank of China. The deposit with a total amount of more than 250 million yuan is also disappeared. In November 2021, the Nanning Intermediate People's Court decided to perform life imprisonment and fined 3.2 million yuan (Reerexiac News).

In June 2022, Ms. Duan, the plaintiff, filed an administrative lawsuit against the Guangxi Banking Regulation Bureau. His acting lawyer Zhou Zhaocheng told Jimu Journalists that the reserve applied for information disclosure to the Guangxi Banking Insurance Regulatory Bureau on November 17, 2021, requiring the bureau to disclose the large deposit bill held by the plaintiff at the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China. For specific information, the response given by the bureau is inaccurate. "Only by understanding the process of wet deposits flying, can I be able to confirm whether the ICBC has fault in the case and how to start the accountability of ICBC in the next step. Said that the case was not sentenced in court today.

According to lawyer Zhou Zhaocheng, the Guangxi Banking Regulatory Bureau issued a number (2021) No. 30 on December 1, 2021, "Guangxi Banking Insurance Regulatory Bureau in accordance with the application for public information answers", but the letter did not respond truthfully. The response emphasized that when the person involved in the case, a period of time through the "02920 person transfer" transaction (counter business integration transaction) was applied for regular deposit deposit accounts. However, this answer contradicts that the response from the People's Bank of China Nanning Central Sub -branch on November 6, 2020 "No existence to the existence of existing for savings accounts for transfer settlement" is contradictory.

Lawyer Zhou Zhaocheng believes that large deposit orders are allowed in advance, either with cash or returned to the bank card of the same name. Therefore, the response of the defendant Guangxi Banking Insurance Bureau was inaccurate. According to Article 6 of my country's "Regulations on the Disclosure of Government Information", "administrative organs should disclose government information in a timely and accurate manner." Therefore, the plaintiff filed an administrative lawsuit and asked the defendant to re -disclose the details of the large deposit. In the trial of Guangxi Banking Regulatory Bureau, the defendant's claim to the plaintiff's claim was denied that he had provided the operation process information obtained by the agent that he had obtained objectively and accurately to the plaintiff. The understanding of information is more than the category of government information disclosure.

(The picture is provided by the respondent)

- END -