The boyfriend's boyfriend suddenly disappeared, and the "marriage entrustment" was sentenced to 11 years in prison for the first trial of fraud.

Ms. Fang and her boyfriend Gao who fell in love for one year was preparing to take wedding photos and enter the palace of marriage. Unexpectedly, the day before the shooting, Gao Mou suddenly disappeared and couldn't contact anymore. After reporting the case, Ms. Fang learned that she had encountered a "marriage" fraud. The Haidian Court was tried and sentenced Gao to 11 years in prison for fraud, deprived of political rights for 1 year, fined 110,000 yuan, and ordered Gao to refund the victim's economic losses.

Simplified case

(The picture shows the photo during the trial)

From November 2019 to December 2020, the defendant Gao Mou and Ma (handled another case) were fictional that Ma Mou had the fact that he had single high -end men's resources and deceived women to accept his "wedding agency service". As a single high -end men's contact with women, after obtaining the goodwill of women, they have deceived the property of the female victims on the grounds that they need to pay the service costs.

(The picture shows the photo during the trial)

In November 2019, the defendant Gao met with the victim Fang Mou in a restaurant under Ma Mou and obtained Fang Mou's favors, and cheated the victim Fangmou RMB 200,000 in the name of the wedding service fee. In addition, during the relationship between the defendant Gao and Fang Mou, he deceived the victim Fang, who had repeatedly transferred more than 1.14 million yuan to the account specified by him, and returned more than 130,000 yuan before the incident.

In July 2020, the defendant Gao met with the victim Cao in a shopping mall under Ma Mou's arrangement under Ma Mou, and after obtaining Cao Mou's favors, he deceived Cao 1 million yuan in the name of a wedding service fee. The defendant Gao Mou took the initiative to invest in the public security organs in February 2021.

(The picture shows the photo during the trial)

The prosecutor believes that the defendant's behavior violates the provisions of Article 266 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. It has constituted a crime of fraud and the amount is particularly huge.

(The picture shows the photo during the trial)

The defendant Gao Mou did not objection to the charges in the indictment, but he believed that the amount of transfer of the victim Fang Mou had not reached more than a million yuan, and the amount of all transfer was recharged by the two -person online gambling. The victim Cao Mou had only seen one side, and it was unclear how much Ma had received. His defender issued a defense opinion that Gao had a self -primary plot; he played a small effect in common crimes, and he was a crime; the victims in this case were fault. The actual profit is less, and it is recommended that the court punished it from lightly.

Council trial

(The picture shows the photo during the trial)

After hearing, the court believed that the defendant Gao had the purpose of illegal possession and deceived the property of others. The amount was particularly huge, and his behavior had constituted a crime of fraud. Regarding the defendant Gao Mou and his defender's defense opinions on the amount of crime of the case, after investigation, objective evidence such as evidence such as the statement of the victims, witness testimony and other words, WeChat chat records, bank transfer records, etc. Ma Mou arranged for the "wedding entrustment" under the direction of words, and deceived the trust of women who seemed to seek marriage and love services through packaging identity and concealing the truth, and then deceived two victims to pay Ma Mou's so -called "wedding service fee".

In the process of associated with Fang, after Gao Mou obtained Fang Mou's trust, he fabricated various reasons to deceive Fang Mou's huge money. Although the victim Cao did not pay the money directly to Gao, Gao Mou still had a "service fee" in this way, and still associated with Cao under the arrangement of Ma Mou to cooperate with Ma to implement it together. The fraud acts, holding a laissez -faire attitude towards the results of the crime, so he also shall also take criminal responsibility for Cao's deception.

Although the defendant Gao Mou took the initiative to the case, he did not immediately confess his crimes after he arrived, and he should not be identified as surrender according to law. Gao Mou directly associated with the victim during the crime and deceived the victim's trust. Although he was not a proposal of criminal intentions, he still played a direct and main role in the common crime. The victims in this case are single women, and there is no fault to obtain marriage services through intermediary service agencies. The defender believes that the behavior of Gao's online gambling constituted a defense opinion on the crime of opening a casino in the law, and the court did not adopt it.

In view of Gao Mou's truthful confession during the trial, and part of the money in this case was directly collected by Ma, the court gave a light punishment when sentencing.

In the end, the court made the above judgment. After the verdict, the defendant Gao did not explicitly appealed, and the case is still in the appeal period.

- END -