The way to protect rights should be legitimate, and illegal means are not desirable

Recently, the Hongyan Temple Court successfully mediate a case of personal rights disputes. The defendant apologized to the plaintiff and compensated the plaintiff for 300 yuan.

Hu Mou complained about Zhang's personality dispute case. The defendant Zhang had an economic dispute with the plaintiff Hu's boyfriend. Its WeChat circle of friends and Douyin platforms, with the text of "debt without debt". And compensate for losses.

Through the inspection of the court, the defendant Zhang had deleted the video involved in the case. In view of the fact that the defendant Zhang had stopped infringement and had a basis of mediation, in order to completely resolve the contradiction between the two parties, the judge mediate the case. In his circle of friends, he publicly apologized to the plaintiff Hu and retained the content of the apology for three days, and compensated the plaintiff Hu Mou to lose 300 yuan.

Rights protection should be said that when its legal rights and interests are infringed, they must be solved through reasonable and legal channels. Even if they are used, they cannot adopt improper means to protect their rights and interests, otherwise they will be unreasonable to lose money!

"Civil Code" small classroom: Independence of personality rights is one of the highlights of the Civil Code. The fourth editor of the Civil Code uses the contents of the six chapters to refine the protection of the personality rights of civil subjects, and changes the "heavy weight in traditional civil law. The system defect of the system. Therefore, when our personality rights are violated, we must bravely pick up legal weapons to safeguard our rights and interests.

- END -