The Tangshan fighting incident caused "minor injuries and not light" Ruan Qilin: Light injury is the definition of criminal criminal standards, and the judgment of the injury results should be adjusted

Cover News Profile reporter Luo Shiyi

On June 21, the Hebei Provincial Public Security Department issued an official report on the injured person in the "Tangshan Barbecue Store". According to the report, on June 20, the Institute of Judicial Appraisal Science issued a letter of judicial appraisal. Wang Moumou and Liu Moumou were minor injuries (level 2), and the degree of damage of Yuan and Li Mou was minor injuries.

As soon as the announcement came out, it caused heated discussion and questioning netizens. The popularity of "light injuries, not light, serious serious injuries" also began on the Internet.

Coincidentally, 6 years ago, a woman was abused by a number of men in Lijiang barbecue stalls. She was used to draw her face with broken wine bottle and was lost in the video and wallet. In the end The maximum personnel were sentenced to three years and six months in prison.

"It looks so serious, why is it just a minor injury?" In response to netizens, on June 22, a cover reporter interviewed Ruan Qilin, a professor at the School of Criminal Justice at the Chinese University of Political Science and Law to interpret multiple questions in the incident.

"Light injury is the standard for defining criminal crimes"

Ruan Qilin introduced that in fact, there is no "concept" in the criminal law. Light injury is only the standard for defining criminal crimes. It is considered to be intentional damage and need to be transferred to the People's Procuratorate. "

After the Tangshan barbecue restaurant, the Hebei Provincial Public Security Department did not officially report the injury to the wounded as soon as possible, but only issued a notice on the 21st. During the 11 days in the middle, the public expressed concern about the unknown injuries of the wounded. So in this case, is the injury identification time lagging behind?

Ruan Qilin said that in the process of appraisal, in addition to making judgments according to the case report of the injured at the time, professionals will also consider the recovery situation afterwards. "Injury identification is generally based on the injuries at the time, and the situation is considered to consider the situation. After seeing, do you have more serious results, such as leaving sequelae, etc."

"The judgment of the result of the injury should be adjusted"

In the "Tangshan Barbecue Incident", the minor injuries and minor injuries of the injured woman were also "questioned", but behind it, it was actually more thinking about the corresponding punishment.

If the injury and the punishment are not matched, how should I solve it in the future? In this regard, Ruan Qilin believes that the problem is mainly in two aspects. First of all, the criteria for entering the crime are more tolerant.

The second is to adjust the judgment of the injury results. "I think that the standard of intentional injury in the Criminal Law can be determined to be mild injuries in the future.

In related reports, the reporter noticed that many netizens proposed that in most violent incidents, victims are usually accompanied by certain mental trauma. In response, the reporter asked Ruan Qilin that in the injury identification standard, it was only evaluated for physical injuries. Can the subsequent appraisal standards be included in the reference? He said that the evaluation of this aspect is difficult to determine. "If the victim is seriously traumatic for the defendant, it is difficult to judge, so it depends on the degree of human damage to define more objective and fair."

- END -