100,000 netizens participated in the "Tuesday Tuesday" to ask the judge and ask questions to focus on real estate lending contracts and other aspects.

The Yangtze River Daily Da Wuhan client September 21st. The hundred judges settled in the Great Wuhan client. After the "Tuesday's Tuesday" column was upgraded every day, netizens asked enthusiastically. As of 1 noon on September 21, a total of 118 questions were received in the column, and more than 100,000 netizens participated in the interaction. At present, Li Chong, the deputy director of the Rotent Judge and Deputy Director of the Executive Bureau of the People's Court of Hanyang District, responded one by one.

At noon on the 20th, netizens at the end of the mobile phone number "999" entered the column and asked the judge. Ten days ago, a part -time teacher at the school was not returned after using the U disk of the school, and was taken and photographed. After the school found out, the teacher insisted that he did not get it. The value of the U disk is not high, but it is equipped with all the lesson plans of the campus, which is very important. The school chose to call the police. The next day, after receiving a call from the police, the teacher asked someone to take the name of the consultation, stealing the U disk back, and was photographed by the school again. How should this case be qualitative now? Is it stealing?

In this regard, Li Chong retired, and suggested that the school closely cooperate with the public security organs to investigate. If it is considered to involve other crimes, it can be reported to the public security organs and prevails with the results of the investigation of the public security organs.

In the past two days, netizens have raised hundreds of legal issues, including 27 of them involved rotating judges. As of press time, the judge has answered 18.

Netizens who were called "013" asked by the mobile phone that he had a private lending case. The lawsuit won. During the execution, the other party had no house and no car, and was included in the blacklist of the dishonest. In the past two years, the other party hasn't paid a penny, but now he found that the other party's health shops and clothing stores have been opened. Want to ask how to defend their rights?

Li Chong replied that if you have evidence to prove that the executed person has income, you can apply for the executive court to perform the income of the person's execution.

Netizen "Song Jibin" said that he had an execution case and did not perform in place for 3 years, and became a "final case." He wanted to ask, if he could not provide the property information of the person's executed person, would he never be executed? Now that you can not find the executable information on the execution of the information on the execution information, have you deleted it? Can I relieve the disappearance of the dishonest without execution?

Li Chong replied to the case of ending the procedure of this enforcement. On the one hand, you can collect the clue of the property clue to the court to resume the implementation, and on the other hand, the court will perform it if they find that the person executed has property. Regarding whether the executed person is restricted to high consumption and included in the list of dishonest personnel, you can go directly to the executive court for case inquiry.

According to statistics, in 118 questions from netizens, the content of the question is mainly concentrated in real estate, borrowing, salary, contract and other aspects.

Because legal issues are very professional and involve the direction of specific cases, it is difficult for judges to answer related questions across professionalism.

Judge Li Chong reminded netizens that when asking questions, it is best not to mention the specific names, the company's name, and the crimes they think, and do not send each other's videos and photos at will. Before the lawsuit is not concluded, the other party is suspected of illegal law. It is easy to be countered by the other party.

The lawsuit in the trial is best not to ask questions. Every case depends on the specific situation. The judge of the trial must know the case better than other judges who only listened to the unilateral opinion.

(Changjiang Daily reporter Chen Yong correspondent Chen Yali Zhuangkai)

【Edit: Wang Rongfei】

For more exciting content, please download the "Da Wuhan" client in the major application markets.

- END -