Extraordinary comment | Women are punished to wear high -heeled shoe frogs when they go to work.

Ji Mu News commentator Qu Jing

Ms. Peng from Wuhan, Hubei, moved to the car for a few minutes at work time. Party A's sales manager leaned out on the grounds of her unauthorized leaving the post and in front of more than thirty sales colleagues to let her wear high heels and frogs. As a result, her muscles were strained and she stopped her post the next day. (According to Guangming.com on September 21)

The employees have made some small mistakes, or the work is not done well, and there are problems with attitude. Use some public performance talents, ask all colleagues to drink milk tea, or make some high -intensity exercise methods for punishment. Management method. Many employees are more willing to accept this method than directly deducting salary and deduction. However, in fact, improper use of this means, loss of proportion will also cause damage to the rights and interests of the workers, and even constitute illegal acts.

Is Ms. Peng going out to move the car time? Is she a violation of regulations? If the company has strict requirements in the work hours in advance, and Ms. Peng does not notify the traffic management department to notify the car, but because she is afraid of getting to the job first to check in and then goes out to move the car by sherself, then the company thinks that she violates the rules and conducts her for her. A certain warning and punishment is reasonable. However, it is questionable whether women can use high -heeled shoe frogs in public.

First of all, women in high heels know that standing and walking for a long time, legs and feet will be very sore, not to mention continuous frog jumps in a short period of time. People who are not good at exercising will be very difficult. Furthermore, letting employees be forced to do some daily movements in public. In fact, the purpose of hiding the ugly and shame is essentially a contempt and insult to their personality dignity.

Many employers may never realize that this management method has involved in disguise, and according to the "Labor Contract Law", if the employer insults, corporal punishment, and beats the workers shall be given administrative penalties in accordance with the law; Liability. Even as stated by the news, the sales manager of Ms. Peng is not her own boss, but that they serve as Party A's company served as Party B, but as long as the management relationship of the superiors is existed, this rude should not be used. Management.

Manager Hu, who made the penalty decision, refused to apologize, thinking that there was no problem with his behavior, and said that the company stipulated that this was the case. Realize that the so -called corporate management and the lack of rule of law and the rule of law.

And this is definitely not an isolated case. There are really many companies that are keen on this kind of disguised punishment. There are really many companies that obey testing methods. From time to time, there will be complaint cases exposed. , The task is not completed, and the slap of each other, etc., under the guise of strict management, insulting the dignity of others, hurting the body of others, not only has no benefit to management, but also exceeds morality and law.

The company's rules and regulations cannot be greater than laws and regulations. It is not any punishment of the rules and regulations. Employees need to accept it unconditionally. All internal systems and measures that are contrary to the law are illegal and invalid. Implementation, if you fail to refuse on the spot, you can also protect your legitimate rights and interests through legal channels afterwards.

In fact, when the reporter intervened, Ms. Peng's company was promoted to Party A's company, and said that she did not stop Ms. Peng's position. The company also knows that this method of punishment is not appropriate or legal. Even Party A's customers cannot violate the personality and physical rights of Party B's employees at will.

I hope that Ms. Peng can continue to discuss a statement for herself through legal channels, and let some arrogant party A managers know that respecting the personality dignity and legitimate rights and interests of their own employees and partner employees is the basis of any commercial cooperation. As long as the "corporate system" involves infringement of the rights and interests of the workers, it must be resolutely corrected, otherwise it will pay a heavy price.

- END -