Forced execution of not soft judicial detention to promote performance

Recently, the Henan Xinmi Court Executive Bureau adopted a compulsory measure to form a case of borrowing contract disputes to effectively safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the parties.

In a case of a borrowing contract between a commercial bank and Liu Mouhui, Wang, and Liu Mouya, the defendant Liu Mouhui returned to the plaintiff's borrowing principal of 100,000 yuan and paid the profit of the profit in accordance with the trial of the new secret court and paid the penalty. The defendant Wang Mou and Liu Mouya bears the liability for liability for the above money. After the verdict came into effect, the defendant had not fulfilled the obligation to take effect. The plaintiff applied for forced execution to the new secret court.

After the case entered the enforcement process, the organizing judge contacted the executed person for the first time and asked him to perform the execution of the case in court, but the executed person was pushed away and rejected the court performance for various reasons. After online and offline investigation and control, the organizer found that there was a car under the name of Liu Mouhui, who was executed, and found his trace in Liu Mouhui's household registration. Back to the court and seized the vehicle. The wife of Liu Mouhui, the executor of the same case, was brought back to the court after learning that Liu Mouhui was taken back to the court, and Wang first expressed his willingness to perform some cases first, deliberately delayed time, and then pushed away from the division for various reasons. The text is not paid. Regarding the executed person Liu Mouhui and his wife Wang, he had been pushing the approach to procrastination and dazzling, and the undertaking judge decided to take judicial detention measures on the executed person Liu Mouhui in accordance with the law.

A few days ago, with the many efforts of the judge, he found that another executed person Liu Moya's whereabouts and brought him back to the court. After a few hours of patient interpretation of the judge, Liu Mouya repented the slightest repentance. The patience communication of the undertaking judge also turned a blind eye. The undertaking judge decided to take mandatory detention measures against Liu Mouya. After the executive Liu Mouya's husband learned the news, he brought the arrears to the court overnight. At this point, the case was concluded.

The New Secret Court insisted on strengthening the implementation and punishment, severely cracking down on the act of refusing to implement the court's effective judgment and ruling, and using various types of compulsory measures to use sufficient activities to severely crack down on the court's effective judgment and ruling. Limited to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties to win the lawsuit, resolutely safeguard legal dignity, and defend judicial authority. (Henan Legal Daily Reporter Wang Xiaolei Correspondent Ma Yinghui Wei Xiaoyan) ⑦

- END -