The thief's awareness of anti -investigation is strong, and the prosecutor can start the evidence chain through a shoe print

On July 22, a public prosecution was filed by the Procuratorate of Linping District, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province.

"I didn't expect that I would plant it on the shoe printing. I took the prosecutor!" After listening to the verdict, Zhang lowered his head and stated that he would not appeal in court. The judgment is now effective.

Insufficient evidence is difficult to conclude

On July 14, 2021, Mr. Sun, who lived in Linping, reported that a number of valuables such as the famous watches, gems and other valuables were stolen, and the value of items was worth more than 200,000 yuan. The investigation of the public security organs quickly locked the suspect Zhang.

On the evening of July 19 of the same year, Zhang was arrested. The trajectory and transaction records of the sale of the luxury goods recycling store were verified, and some stolen goods were recovered, but Zhang refused to plead guilty. Unfortunately, the community surveillance twice took Zhang Mou's picture of Zhang Mou in the community in the community, but did not take whether he had entered Mr. Sun's house. There was no traces of Zhang's fingerprints in Mr. Sun's house.

On August 17, 2021, the public security organs submitted the case to the procuratorial organs for approval. "The criminal suspect had a strong awareness of the former subject and the awareness of evasion of the investigation. The monitoring did not take a complete trajectory, and there were no traces at the scene of the crime center ..." In the face of this major theft of households, do you catch or not to catch it? The prosecutor was reviewed that Zhang had insufficient objective evidence to enter Mr. Sun's house to implement theft. The public security organs supplemented the investigation, but still failed to find a breakthrough. Prosecutors decided to go to the scene of the crime to find clues.

A shoe printing string of evidence chain

"Go the scene again!" The prosecutor went to the scene of the crime with the police of the police and conducted a careful investigation of the inside and outside of Mr. Sun's house. Finally, they found an incomplete shoe print on the sunshine glass top.

"Here is the 27th floor. Most people can't climb the glass top, it's too suspicious." The group expanded the scope of the investigation, found the same shoe print on the fire building, and found traces of tramples outside the 30 -story roof window.

Who left this shoe print? The prosecutor immediately guided the public security personnel to retrieve evidence of various parties and found that the shoe prints came from a pair of men's leather shoes; Zhang happened to buy the same black leather shoes in March 2020. The prosecutor found that the pair of shoes also appeared in another theft of Zhang, and the shoe printing pattern was consistent. The shoe was detained to Zhang's father in April 2020.

In the surveillance video screen, Zhang Mou with a backpack is clearly wearing white sneakers. What is going on? Through in -depth investigations, prosecutors and police will restore Zhang's crimes after the evidence of the case "puzzle".

It turned out that Zhang, who had a strong anti -investigation consciousness, first wore white sneakers into the community, then put on black leather shoes and turned to the fire building. After walking to the top floor of the 30th floor, climbed down to the 27th floor. Theft was carried out in the house. After he succeeded, he went downstairs in the fire corridor, replaced the white sneakers, and then drove to a luxury goods recycling store to sell stolen goods.

On August 24, 2021, Zhang was approved by law.

Prosecutors calmly cope with "ghost defense"

After investigation, on June 22 and July 14, 2021, Zhang entered the victim's house twice through the above methods to stole famous brand watches, jewelry and other items. It is determined that the total value of the property involved in the case is worth more than 290,000 yuan.

The procuratorate believes that, with the purpose of illegal possession, Zhang secretly steal the property of others. The circumstances are particularly serious and are dedicated. They should be held criminally responsible for theft and punishment. On April 25 this year, the Linting District Procuratorate of Hangzhou filed a public prosecution to Zhang in accordance with the law.

On June 21, the case was tried in the Linping District Court. In the court, Zhang only acknowledged some of the criminal facts, and made one of the stolen sources of stolen goods proposed by the prosecutor, Zhang Guanli Dai, and conducted a "ghost defense". The prosecutor had long been prepared and cleverly questioned the relevant details, and Zhang had to continue to lie. The prosecutor also presented objective evidence such as witness testimony, records of stolen stolen records, and on -site shoe prints. A large number of sufficient evidence pierced all Zhang's lie in court.

On July 22, the court accepted all the charges of the procuratorial organs and made the above judgment.

(Source: Prosecutor's Daily Author: Fan Yuehong Yu Jingbing)

- END -