like!Chengdu Intermediate People's Court's judicial transparency index has been in the forefront of the country for 9 consecutive years

The reporter was informed today that on June 18, the Institute of Law of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences issued the "China Law Development Report (2022)", which announced the results of the third -party evaluation of the Chinese judicial transparency index in 2021. Chengdu Intermediate Court ranked seventh among the 49 evaluated intermediate courts across the country.

Chengdu Intermediate People's Court stated that in 2021, the Chengdu Intermediate People's Court implemented the work requirements of judicial disclosure of the courts of the courts, learned advanced judicial experience in advanced courts, comprehensively deepened the judicial disclosure, and met the people's new requirements and new expectations for judicial disclosure. The people feel fair and just in each judicial case.

It is reported that in 2021, the Chengdu Court publicly referees' referee documents and documents and information summary of the China Magistrates Document Network in 2021. There were 350,456 abstracts. It reached 99.96%, an effective disclosure rate of 98.92%, and insisted on disclosing information such as disclosure of information through the information disclosure network.

At present, relying on the four major platforms of judicial disclosure deployed by the national courts, the Chengdu Intermediate Court takes the self -made judicial network of Chengdu Court as an important carrier to publicly display the trial information, trial process information, and judicial reform information of the two levels of courts. Wait, update and improve the open project in a timely manner to meet the judicial needs of the masses.

In addition, the Chengdu Intermediate People's Court adhered to the 100%disclosure of the information disclosure rate of the trial process to disclose the parties or their litigation agents to effectively protect the parties' right to know the information information of the trial process; implement the compulsory quality inspection and proofreading mechanism before the referee documents go out, and ensure that the referee documents are disclosed by the disclosure of the referee documents. Both quality and efficiency improvement; adhere to the principle of the quality of trials first, and continuously improve the public influence and social effects of the trial.

Chengdu Daily Jinguan News reporter Chen Di Editor He Qixie Editor Liu Yonghao

- END -