Sanhe Court held a criminal trial trial review activity

In order to further improve the judicial level of judges and the ability to control the trial, improve the quality of case handling, and promote the standardization of court trials, on the morning of August 30, the Sanhe Court held a criminal trial trial review activity. Ma Chenghe, a member of the party group and the full -time members of the trial committee, and all police officers of the Criminal Court attended the observation review.

The case of the trial of the trial of the court was the case of the defendant Zhao in suspicion of fraud, and used the remote trial system to "separate" the remote trial system for the prevention and control of the epidemic. As the chief of the trial, Li Rulian, the vice president of the Criminal Court, skilled the court's investigation, court debate, and party statement, etc., and rationally guided the two parties to express opinions on the guidance and punishment of convictions, evidence facts, and legal applications. The secretary and the tributary of the duty are duties. After the trial, the Ma Chenghe Special Committee hosted the Council of Observation and Evaluation. At the meeting, various observations made detailed comments from the preparation of the court, the standards of words and deeds, the trial procedures, the trial control, the order of court, and the judicial image.

The Ma Chenghe Special Committee pointed out that the trial of the observation court was an important measure for the Sanhe Court to conduct in -depth training in the job skills. Through this trial, it not only enhanced the judgment quality and trial ability of judges and clerks, but also set up a platform for all police officers of the Criminal Court to build a platform for exchange trial experience and mutual learning and progress.

The Ma Chenghe Special Committee requested that the Criminal Court must normalize the trial of the Guanmo, carefully investigate the details and weak links in the trial work, and strive to improve the standardization level of the trial, and promote the continuous improvement of the overall trial and efficiency of the court.

- END -