"Acquaintances" borrowing disputes to build "bridge" to promote mediation

In recent years, the number of civil lending cases has remained high, showing that the parties have the characteristics of most of the parties, the defendant's refusal to respond, and the non -standard borrowing form. For non -governmental lending cases of different characteristics, different strategies often adopt different strategies when undertaking judges. For example, if the parties have specific relationships, the undertaking judges will pay more attention to mediation, both talk about jurisprudence and "emotional" cards, and objectively analyze the parties to objective and fair analysis. The case, sincerely and patiently put forward suggestions to build a "bridge" for them to promote the reconciliation between the two parties, and truly achieve the effect of the case, the incident, and the harmony.

This case is a civil loan case that happened between acquaintances. The borrower Zhou Mou borrowed money from Mao because of the urgent need of money. It was said that there was no money, and Mao said to the court under the average. During the first instance, Zhou did not attend the lawsuit during the first instance. The court sentenced him to repay the loan and interest, but after the sentence, Zhou appealed, making Mao Mou emotionally fierce and refused to mediate.

The undertaking judge considers that the case involves a small amount, and the two parties have been friends for many years. Therefore, the laws of civil loan disputes have stipulated that they have patiently persuaded the parties through WeChat and telephone. At the same time, it also effectively reduced the confrontation between the two sides and relieved the tension between the two sides. The two parties finally reached an agreement. Mao voluntarily gave up interest, and Zhou paid 20,000 yuan on the spot. (Supply of the two courts of Huaibei Central Court)

- END -