Fourth -level court trial function positioning reform promotes the scientific matching of the case structure and the function of the trial level

Xinhua News Agency, Beijing, August 30 (Reporter Qi Qi, Luosha) The Supreme People's Court's Interim Report on the Pilot Reform of the Fourth Court of Fourth Courts' Trial Function Positioning Reform "was requested to review the meeting of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress on the 30th. The report shows that since the pilot work was officially launched in October 2021, the four -level courts have gradually optimized the audit function, the structure and distribution of the case are becoming more and more reasonable, the configuration of judicial powers is more scientific, and the quality of contradictions and disputes have effectively improved.

The report pointed out that on the basis of adhering to the "four -level and two -trial system" system, the pilot work has adjusted the provisions of the applied administrative proceedings on the level jurisdiction, and promoted the four types of administratives that will not be tried in difficulty, less local intervention, and appropriate to resolve on the spot. The case was tried by the grassroots people's court. Through the reform of civil and administrative retrial application procedures and standards, the supporting mechanism of rearing the case was improved, and the scientific matching of the trial resources, the structure of the case, and the functional positioning of the fourth -level courts were achieved.

In the past year in the past year, the focus of trials has sinking reasonably, and contradictions and disputes have been promoted to achieve fair and efficient and substantial resolution at the grassroots level. After the adjustment of the standards of civil and administrative levels, the pilot grassroots people's court accepted 9,570 civil cases of "sinking", accounting for only 0.15%of all new first -instance civil cases in the same period, and 11275 cases of "sinking" four types of administrative cases were accepted. , Accounting for 6.76%of the first instance administrative cases, the quality of trials has been steadily improved.

The report shows that the high and middle -level people's courts in various pilot areas improve the relegation mechanism, standardize the workflow, and effectively activate the jurisdiction mechanism. Since the pilot, the high and middle -level people's courts have raised a total of 435 cases, an increase of 19.50%year -on -year. Legal cases involving the right to confirm the right to data rights, online unfair competition, and the qualifications of new business employment subjects cover civil, administrative, intellectual property and other fields.

In accordance with the requirements of the pilot work, the Supreme People's Court and the High People's Court promoted the improvement of the operation mechanism of the retrial procedure. Since the pilot, the Supreme People's Court has received 2,275 cases of re -examination of civil and administrative applications, a decrease of 85.33%compared with the pilot. The high -level people's courts accepted the application for retrial review cases of 24,9323 cases, of which 16,094 applications were applied for retrial applications for civil and administrative cases, including 5,428 retrial applications for the Supreme People's Court "submitted". 2.18%of the application for retrial review cases. The re -hearing of the operating mechanism of the retrial has continued to improve, and the re -hearing of the re -review of error correction and the maintenance of the referee authority is unified.

In the next step, the Supreme Law will further improve the pilot work promotion mechanism, improve the supporting guarantee, consolidate and improve the effectiveness of the pilot work, improve the discovery, identification and screening mechanism of major typical cases, establish a special management mechanism for re -review review cases and retrial cases, and promote the establishment of retrial review The charging system promotes the enhancement of the integration effect of the reform system. Further advance the pilot work, and promote the improvement of the system of reviewing the level of trial with Chinese characteristics and in line with judicial laws.

[Editor in charge: Liu Yang]

- END -