[Creating the "Creation of the Practice for the Mass" Demonstration Court] Cross -domain collaboration cases make the lawsuit more convenient and faster

"I was willing to return 6,000 yuan because I couldn't contact the remittant at that time ..." Tang said when Tang said on the online mediation of the judge.

Recently, the Tawen Aobao Court of Moqi People's Court accepted a civil dispute case transferred in different places. The parties Liu were residents of Chengde City, Hebei Province. At the end of 2021, Liu filled the receipt account wrong when operating a mobile banking transfer, which caused 6,000 yuan to remit to others' accounts. In the case of many attempts to contact the account owner of the account, Tang Mou failed to succeed, and Liu reluctantly sued him to the Shuangqiao District People's Court of Chengde City, Hebei Province. After accepting the case, the People's Court of Shuangqiao District was investigated by the Moqi household registration of Tang and believed that there was no jurisdiction over the case, and then transferred to the Moqi People's Court.

According to the jurisdiction of the household registration, the Tawen Aobao Court of the Moqi People's Court accepted the case. After understanding the cadres of the original villages in the place of residence, Tang has left the place where the household registration is located for more than ten years and may now live in Tieling County, Liaoning. Subsequently, the court staff contacted the Tieling County People's Court, hoping to contact Tang and entrusted to send relevant legal documents.

At the beginning of April, with the efforts of many parties, the court contacted Tang, and the judge held the case with the assistance of the Tieling County People's Court. During the mediation process, Tang expressed his willingness to return it to 6,000 yuan. And explained that the person who could not be contacted to himself, so the 6,000 yuan has been in the account. The party Liu also expressed that he could understand that the two sides reached a reconciliation. Tang expressed his willingness to return 6,000 yuan. Withdrawal.

In recent years, due to the popularity of mobile transfer remittance business, the situation that the money was remitted to others due to the error of filling in the information. Can't delay. However, as the people's court began to use the mobile micro Court system, the court has become smoother in cross -domain collaborative case handling. In terms of delivery and execution, it is easier to find parties. The two parties provide litigation convenience, reduce the cost of litigation, and improve the efficiency of case trial.

- END -