The industrial committee has dismantled the owner's stairs court's judgment to restore the original state

Cover Journalist Yang Bo

The decision made by the industry committee has legal binding to the owner. If the industry committee violates the legitimate rights and interests of the owner, how should the owner defend the rights? Recently, the Wenjiang Court tried a case of property protection disputes, and the owners involved in the case were successful. How do you defend your rights?

In August 2021, a communist committee was built by some original developers when Wang Moumou bought a house for no reason. The steel frame staircase that passed the fire acceptance acceptance will be removed from the materials worth about 40,000 yuan.

Wang Moumou believes that the community property service enterprise failed to manage the legal property responsibilities of the management and protection of the owners, which led to the intention of the industry committee to make damage to Wang Moumou's property. Essence

The Wenjiang Court tried that the case involved in the staircase community was built to ensure the passage of the plaintiff Wang Moumou's house. Now the community industry committee demolished the stairs for no reason, violating the property rights of the house owner Wang Moumou. The community property service enterprise has the obligation to manage and maintain the safety and property safety of the owners, but in the trial, it stated in the trial and did not know who the stairs were demolished and demolished.

According to the above facts, the Wenjiang Court ruled that the defendant's community industry committee and community property service enterprise resumed the plaintiff Wang Moumou's steel stairs within 15 days of the decision. Property service companies bear 30%), and the two parties have not appealed, and the case has taken effect.

The industry committee was an institution established to protect the rights of the owner, but the industry committee in this case demolished the legal steel frame stairs of the owner without authorization, and infringing the owners' property rights to the house, which contrary to its original intention.

The community property should be a serviceman and guardian of the owner's life and property, but the property in the middle and communities in this case does not know the behavior of the industry committee infringing the rights of the owner. It has not fulfilled the obligations of the property service company, and neither the service, nor the guardian.

As the owner, you should actively take the responsibility of supervising the industry committee and property, and defend your own legitimate rights. Once you encounter the industry committee and property to violate your legitimate rights and interests, you should immediately keep the evidence complete in order to defend your rights in order It is well -founded in the process.

- END -