On the second day of the second instance of the Lao Rongzhi case: the handwriting appraiser appeared in court to testify, the prosecution played the interrogation video

Cover Journalist Yang Feng Shi Wei Jiangxi Nanchang Report

On August 19, 2022, the second day of the second trial of the Lao Rongzhi case was closed.

During the trial of this Japanese court, the two parties in the prosecution and the "Changzhou case" and "Hefei cases" involved in Lao Rongzhi conducted a court investigation and proof of evidence. Because the two parties were controversial, they would continue the trial on August 20. More than 70 people including Lao Rongzhi's family members, the family members of the "Nanchang Case", the media, the legal circles, and the masses participated in the trial and attended the hearing.

The cover reporter learned from the trial site that during the trial of this day, Lao Rongzhi overturned a lot of unfavorable confession she had made by her "Changzhou case" and "Hefei case", denied intentional homicide. British persecution, no conspiracy, not a master criminal, but a threatened criminal;

At the request of Lao Rongzhi defenders, the court summoned two handwriting appraisers to appear in court to conduct a test of whether there was a handwriting added by Lao Rongzhi in the "Hefei case" in the "Hefei case"; Some of the timely recording and videos of Lao Rongzhi were tried; the two parties conducted multiple rounds of proof of evidence on the effective judgment of the Hefei Intermediate People's Court and the Nanchang Intermediate People's Court.

Lao Rongzhi was wearing a white protective suit to participate in the trial. During the interrogation stage, he tears twice to tell the past that he was beaten and abused by Fa, and said that he had been broken by Fa Ying in his mouth. It was beaten by Fa Ying with a stool. Occasionally, it was occasionally painful.

The second trial of the Lao Rongzhi case opened. Picture source: Jiangxi High Court

Lao Rongzhi argued:

"I am a teacher, how can I turn myself into robbery?"

On August 19, Lao Rongzhi accepted many questions from the prosecution. When the prosecution asked the details of the crime, he answered "unclear". Lao Rongzhi said, "How did I become a teacher into a robbery?"

In response to the prosecutor's allegations, "the surface is engaged in the serving service, and the object of the crime is really imposed." Lao Rongzhi argued that this was dominated by the Fa -Ying. "I work to make money to live. There is no ability to distinguish whether a person has money, Fa Ying asked me to report to him every day. "

The prosecution questioned, "Why do things report to Faye Ying?"

Lao Rongzhi returned: "You can ask Faye Ying."

The prosecutor asked: "You and Faying have gone to many cities, what are you doing?" Lao Rongzhi replied: "I want to live, go and see the great rivers and mountains of the motherland."

The prosecutor asked, "You said he was controlled by Fa, why he went to so many places together." Lao Rongzhi replied, "I was arranged by him like a walking dead at that time. I still want to go to Washington, can I go? ? "

Lao Rongzhi also argued that she did not like Faye Ying at all, hate him, and fear him. "I will choose a good person to make friends. Tens of millions of yuan, hundreds of millions of people. "

Regarding the "Changzhou case", Lao Rongzhi admitted that Liu's feet have denied that he has denied his hand, and admits that Liu who wants to run away with a tiger's pliers wants to run away. Blood, definitely not. " The defense believes that many details of the "Changzhou Case" require the only survivor Liu Mou's court for a qualitative certificate in this case. But Liu was unwilling to appear in court on the grounds of privacy.

The prosecutor refutes in the court. From Lao Rongzhi, Fa Ziying's confession, and witness testimony, it can be confirmed that in the case, from color seductive to abduction, to robbery, not one person can complete, the two are division of labor cooperation cooperation , Conspiracy.

Regarding the "Hefei case", Lao Rongzhi once again claimed that he did not conspire to participate in the case, and there was no color to seduce Yin Mouhua. "That day, Yin Mouhua contacted me first. Fa Ying knew it, let me call him home, and Fa Ying suddenly controlled him with a knife."

She said that if she is leading, she will definitely not choose Yin Mouhua to start. "He has no money." Lao Rongzhi denied multiple main details in the case. " ","

When Lao Rongzhi said that when he was guarding Yin Hua in the iron cage next door, he heard the screams of Faye Ying killed the little carpenter Lu Mouming. "The horrible voice was scared." Use the opportunity of "buying supper" to escape the rental house. Objective evidence shows that Yin Mouhua dial the passage of Lao Rongzhi at 10:22 on July 22.

The prosecutor refuted in court, and there were testimony and Lao Rongzhi and Fa Ying's confession. "Buying a supper to escape from the rental house" is a single confession of Lao Rongzhi and should not be accepted. In the first instance, the two were not identified as the two people killed Yin Mouhua, but they found that the two were killed together. Lao Rongzhi should bear criminal responsibility for this.

The second trial of the Lao Rongzhi case opened. Picture source: Jiangxi High Court

Defender questioned the objectivity of the note handwriting

Writing appraiser to testify in court

On the morning of August 18th, the defender's determination of the identification of the appraisal of the appraisal of the appraisal of the appraisal of the objection to the court in the first instance judgment of the Hefei case of "Yin Mouhua wrote to his wife." Cover reporters learned that this note proves that Lao Rongzhi has a key objective objective physical physical evidence with subjective malignant.

On the afternoon of August 19, the court summoned two handwriters to appraiser in court to conduct a certificate of evidence. According to the appraiser, the entrusted appraisal agency has issued two appraisal reports on the inspection materials. In the first report, it was determined that the handwriting was written by a person. The second report was determined that it was not written by one person. The second report was accepted by the court of first instance. The official website of the Supreme People's Procuratorate published a report saying that when the prosecutor was looking for the case of the court's law British case, it was found that Yin Mouhua's handwriting note might be added by others, which was suspected to be Lao Rongzhi. After the public security organs proposed to supplement the handwriting to identify the handwriting, the technical investigators of the public security organs concluded that the handwriting was written by a person, which may be affected by the mentality, which is slightly different.

In order to solve the doubts in the heart, the case handling team carried out its own reconnaissance investigation and handed the evidence to the technical department of the Jiangxi Provincial Procuratorate for writing. The document inspection and appraisal of the Jiangxi Provincial Procuratorate said that they organized the inspection force of the province's procuratorial organs to check the handwriting, and it was discussed with the experts of the document inspection department of the Chinese Criminal Police Academy. The handwriting in the Lao Rongzhi notebook seized by the public security organs and the experimental samples written after the Lao Rongzhi case were written by the same person.

The appraiser stated in the process of qualifying that the identification sample extracted the laptop and the trace of the laptop before the arrest of Lao Rongzhi. Compared with the note, it was confirmed that her handwriting was slightly different, which was a normal change.

The defender believes that "the appraisal process of the inspection materials has intervention, and the objective is doubtful, and hopes to re -identify the handwriting." In addition, in addition to the appraisal of the handwriting of Lao Rongzhi, the defender also hopes to identify with the British handwriting.

The second trial of the Lao Rongzhi case opened. Photography: Yang Feng

The court played Lao Rongzhi audited recording video

Facing the interrogation occasionally with a smile

On August 18, Lao Rongzhi spoke many times that investigators often misunderstood her meaning, and the transcript of the proves and her language had a certain difference. The defender also said that the recording of the trial was discovered that the confession, the transcript and the language were inconsistent, and the interrogation process was not compliant.

On August 18th, after the assessment of the parliamentary court, a transcript was excluded by illegal evidence for single -person interrogation, and the remaining illegal evidence exclusion proposed by the defender was required to be rejected by the collegiate panel. The prosecutor said that it took 1 month to check the surveillance video of Lao Rongzhi during the interrogation, and did not find that Lao Rongzhi and his defender said that the transcript was inconsistent with the language.

On August 19, Lao Rongzhi once again said that what she said in the process of transcript and interrogation was inconsistent. The court stated that some Lao Rongzhi was allowed to play a synchronous recording video clip during the interrogation.

The clips played in the trial are the video clips of Lao Rongzhi on December 31, 2019 on the "Changzhou Case". The cover news reporter saw that in the video, Lao Rongzhi wore a pink cotton jacket blue vest with a hair, and he swayed on his upper body when he spoke. Sometimes his head was shaking back and forth, and occasionally with a smile. Due to the poor signal transmission of the listening court, the reporter could not hear the specific content of the dialogue between Lao Rongzhi and the interrogator.

According to the defense and prosecution's qualifications, most of the content mentioned in this video is consistent with the transcript, but the defender pointed out that Lao Rongzhi said that "he and Fa Ying are a grasshopper on the rope". Appear. The prosecutor responded that the content appeared elsewhere, and the case handler summarized here. The chief of the trial said that due to the limited trial time, the collegiate panel will review relevant evidence after court.

Retrospective

Lao Rongzhi was born in Jiujiang, Jiangxi in 1974. In 1994, Lao Rongzhi confirmed the relationship between men and women and women. During 1996 to 1999, Lao Rongzhi was accused of committing it with Fa Ying in Nanchang, Wenzhou, Changzhou, and Hefei. 4 Cases of kidnapping, robbery, and homicide.

In 1999, Faye Ying was arrested in Hefei. On December 28 of the same year, Faye Ying was executed. Twenty years after Lao Rongzhi fled, he was arrested in Xiamen on November 28, 2019.

On December 21, 2020, the Lao Rongzhi case was tried in the Nanchang Intermediate People's Court.

On September 9, 2021, the Nanchang Intermediate People's Court publicly sentenced the first instance. Lao Rongzhi was sentenced to intentional homicide, robbery, and abduction, and decided to perform the death penalty. Lao Rongzhi expressed dissatisfaction with the results of the verdict and appealed in court.

[If you have news clues, please report to us. Report WeChat Follow: IHXDSB, Report QQ: 3386405712]

- END -