Paying 409,000 yuan on the spot to resolve disputes involving enterprise -related enterprise

On the afternoon of August 18, 2022, the Qinzhou Court of the Beihai Maritime Court successfully mediate together maritime and maritime disputes. After reaching a mediation agreement, the defendant paid 409,000 yuan to the plaintiff on the spot. The earth saves time and cost costs, effectively reduces the complaint between the two parties and has won praise from the enterprise.

On April 30, 2019 and May 7, 2019, the plaintiff Qinzhou Ship Service Co., Ltd. and the defendant in Qinzhou, Guangxi Qinzhou, have signed the "Period Pollution Emergency Preparation and Emergency Response Service Contracts", "Pet Bulling Maintenance Management Service "Contract", "The Monthly Rental Agreement on the Waiting Oil Board of the Sea", stipulates that the plaintiff provides pollution and emergency services for the defendant's liquid cargo terminal, and conducts oil spill control, recycling and cleaning operations and the distribution of oil fences, maintenance and other services. Essence During the performance of the contract, a total of 749,000 yuan was incurred, but the defendant only paid 340,000 yuan, and it owed 409,000 yuan. Since then, the two sides have failed to negotiate many times. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit with the Qinzhou Court of Beihai Maritime Court on August 1, 2022, asking the defendant to repay the service fee of 409,000 yuan and interest.

After the case was filed, Liao Guoliang, the judge Liao Guoliang quickly conducted an evaluation of the economic impact of the enterprise in the case, and personally went to the defendant's office to deliver the response materials to further understand the reasons for the dispute between the two parties. It is understood that the defendant has been unable to perform due to market and epidemic. The defendant stated that he was unwilling to expand the contradiction and hoped to resolve the contradiction quickly. Considering the normal operation of the two enterprises, the undertaking judges have repeatedly interpreted the law to the parties, and guided the parties to reconcile in a targeted manner. I hope that through the way that the production and operation of the company's production and operation is less, it can resolve conflicts and disputes. The case was completed and the two companies were avoided by the intensification of the contradictions between the two companies. During the mediation process, the undertaking judge focused on reconciled the contradiction between the two parties from the perspective of optimizing the business environment and protecting the market entities, reminding the enterprises involved in the case to take this opportunity to reasonably resolve the contradictions, reduce the cost of litigation, and explain the focus on the focus of disputes, guide the two parties to understand the understanding of both parties to understand The other party's difficulties and obey the principles of honesty and trustworthiness. With the efforts of the undertaking judge, the parties on both sides decided to make one step. The two sides finally reached a mediation agreement on August 18, 2022. The defendant paid at one time and the solution was 409,000 yuan. The contradiction was completely resolved, and the two sides shook hands. After the mediation, the two parties applied to the court to issue a mediation letter. (Chen Sihui writes, Zhu Guangzong Photography)

- END -