The second trial of the Lao Rongzhi case is being tried to trial the victim's acting lawyer: Lao Rongzhi changed the judgment and expects that it is likely to fail

On the morning of August 18th, the second trial of the Lao Rongzhi case, which received much attention. The Jiangxi Provincial Higher People's Court previously announced that at 9:30 am on August 18th, the court will publicly trial Lao Rongzhi in the Fourth Trial Court to publicize the crime of intentional homicide, robbery, and kidnapping.

↑ The Lao Rongzhi case opened in the second instance of the High People's Court of Jiangxi Province (according to the screenshot of the second trial of the trial of the second instance)

On September 9, 2021, the first instance of the Nanchang Intermediate People's Court publicly pronounced it. Lao Rongzhi was convicted of intentional homicide, robbery, and abduction, and was sentenced to death.

During the trial of the first instance, Lao Rongzhi believed that she was coerced by the Fa, and played an auxiliary role. She did not seek together with the Fa Ying. The Nanchang Intermediate People's Court of the first instance believes that the relevant evidence is enough to prove Lao Rongzhi's crime.

After the first trial was sentenced, the defendant Lao Rongzhi refused to accept the verdict and appealed in court. Four people including the plaintiff Zhu Dahong with civil lawsuit.

Brother Lao Rongzhi:

My sister was coerced, and the second instance would provide relevant evidence

On the morning of August 18th, before the trial began, Lao Rongzhi's second brother and five other family members arrived at the court's door and waited for the court. Lao Rongzhi's second brother told Hongxing News that the first instance lawyer was not commissioned by his family members and did not communicate with his family members. Water witnesses who were coerced by Lao Rongzhi did not try to defend him. This time, the family commissioned the Beijing AIA Law Firm Wu Danhong and Zhao Defang.

He believes that there are many contradictions in the first instance judgment. He hopes that the second instance will be able to let the public understand what kind of person Lao Rongzhi is with the help of the lawyer, and what kind of coercion it is.

Lao Rongzhi's second brother also doubted the conditions for the export confession of Lao Rongzhi, thinking that he did not understand the Fa, and said some violations of the interrogation personnel in the case of self -violence.

Lao Rongzhi's second brother said that since Lao Rongzhi left Jiujiang in July 1996, they have never seen each other. Speaking of the impression of her sister, Lao Er said that she was well -behaved and obedient, and many neighbors and acquaintances thought so. He believes that Lao Rongzhi is not a wicked person. The evil people will continue to commit crimes. Lao Rongzhi has been coerced by Fayu Ying. During the second instance, the family members commissioned lawyers to provide relevant evidence.

↑ On August 18, 2022, in Beijing, citizens were concerned about the second trial of the Lao Rongzhi case to open the network live broadcast. Picture according to visual China

Relatives of the victim:

Lao Rongzhi caused a lot of harm to my family, and it could not be made up anymore

Zhu Dahong, one of the victims of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the Hefei case, said that when the first trial, Lao Rongzhi apologized to the victim's family, but he did not accept it. Drop. " After Zhu Dahong did not appeal after the first trial, he did not receive a notice from the court's second instance. She would not go to the scene this time, but she said, "believe in the law."

During the live broadcast of the second trial trial, the victim Lu Zhongming's children talked about the life after the incident and his views on the case. At the time of the incident in 1999, Lu Zhongming's son was four years old and his younger daughter was more than two years old. They claimed that they had no memory at that time, and they did not expect to see him last. Lu Zhongming's wife did cleaning work. When farmers were busy, they went home to plant fields, and rely on meager income for three siblings to go to school.

The little daughter recalled the life at the time. "At that time, the house fell in the house, and the mother was carrying the rural snake skin bags, three or four bags of clothes, and a particularly heavy rain. Take us to find it under the eaves to hide. At that time, very pitiful, I hope to have a home. "

Lu Zhongming's son said, "It's not easy for me to drag our three children alone over the years. There is no way to accept the rice in the field, and my mother will ask others to pull the rice back with a tractor."

Regarding the first trial judgment, Lu Zhongming's son believed that "she has escaped for more than two decades and lives a life outside the galloping method, which has caused a lot of harm to my family. My mother also dragged us three because my father left, and a person dragged us three. A child is too tired, and the body is not particularly good now. I hate the defendant. "Lu Zhongming's little daughter believes that although the trial of Lao Rongzhi was sentenced to death, it could not make up for the harm to his family for many years.

For the expectations of the second instance, Lu Zhongming's family still wanted to sentence the defendant to death and make certain compensation for them.

Lawyer's point of view:

The first trial gave her full debate, changed the expectation or failure

For the second trial, Liu Jingjie, the agent lawyer of Lu Zhongming's wife Zhu Dahong, believes that although the victim's family did not appeal, he would continue to pay attention to the case.

Some focus on the second trial, Liu Jingjie explained from the perspective of an agent lawyer.

↑ On September 9, 2021, outside the Nanchang Intermediate People's Court, Liu Jingjie, a little carpenter's wife, was interviewed by the media. Picture according to visual China

Focus ①

Is it possible that Lao Rongzhi does not accept the first instance judgment to appeal?

"I think it is unlikely to the fact that what she (Lao Rongzhi) is convincing as the facts. I tried two days in the first instance and gave Lao Rongzhi's full justification time. What she said was the law. British intimidation, threats, or dare not leave the Fa Ziying, and have not participated in the same conspiracy. These are not established, and there are no evidence to prove these issues. "Lawyer Liu Jingjie introduced.

Attorney Liu Jingjie pointed out that looking at the entire case, the four crimes, seven or nine victims were determined by the judgment, and Lao Rongzhi was very active in the case. She is not the time to escape, nor is it possible to leave Faye Ying. Every time the case, the law, tells her to get the money at the entrance of the First People's Hospital in each place. This was proposed by Lao Rongzhi. She believes that the people at the gate of the hospital are coming and going, and no one will pay attention to others at the gate of the hospital. "In addition, every time Faye Ying's robbery was kept by Lao Rongzhi, Lao Rongzhi argued that she had no right to spend money. After killing a family of three in Nanchang, they returned to Jiujiang, Jiangxi, and lived in Fa Ying Home, Lao Rongzhi did not return to Jiujiang's home. After learning that the public security was looking for them, they escaped again. From the facts, she did not have a chance to escape. It's not as pitiful as she said. "

Liu Jingjie believes that the summary of Lao Rongzhi in the first instance is very in place, the circumstances are particularly bad, the subjective viciousness is extremely deep, the means are extremely cruel, the personal and social harmfulness is extremely high, and the crime and crime behavior are particularly serious, so she should be punished according to law. For the focus of the second instance, she believes that it is still in the crime of homicide. "Lao Rongzhi has no murder, but it can only be said that there is no direct murder, but it cannot prove that it does not constitute a co -confession. One trial of three death penalty, kidnapping death, death penalty, intentional killing of death, she hopes that it is likely to change the judgment that it is likely to be likely It will fall out. If the judgment is changed, it is also unfair to the seven victims and family members. "

Focus ②

Can the second trial be sentenced to the court and after the second trial?

Attorney Liu Jingjie believes that the second instance may not be pronounced in court. According to the law, the appeal has a public trial process, and she also gives her a chance for Lao Rongzhi. For the majority of netizens and the masses, it is also an opportunity to conduct legal education and rule of law education. Let everyone know how to judge such cases and how to reflect fairness and fairness.

In addition, Lawyer Liu pointed out that it cannot be appealed after the second instance, because our country stipulates that it is the final trial of the two trials. However, after the second instance, if the court found that there was an error in the judgment, or the parties requested that the appeal, if it met the retrial conditions, they could be retracted. Regarding the case of Lao Rongzhi, Lawyer Liu believes that there is almost no possibility of retrial, "she must be severely punished by law."

Lawyer Liu Jingjie said: "The law will judge fairly and will not last for 20 years because she escapes. This late trial will give her the opportunity to evade legal sanctions."

Red Star reporter Chen Qingyuan Cai Xiaoyi intern Yan Ya Cao Yanyu

Responsible Editor Ren Zhijiang Editor He Pionee

- END -