With the implementation of the fine strategy of maritime trials as the continuous improvement of the quality of the trial and judicial credibility

In recent years, the Beihai Maritime Court has implemented the strategy of maritime trials in depth according to the obvious characteristics of maritime trial professionalism and external related characteristics, strengthening the awareness of boutiques, and effectively promoting and improving the quality of trial and judicial quality of the hospital. And judicial credibility.

1. Establish a boutique case cultivation mechanism and polish the business card of maritime judicial credibility

Implement the work of fine cases, emphasize the source discovery, give full play to the first discovery of the case, the secondary screening function of the sub -trial stage, and establish a system of major foreign -related cases, difficult complicated maritime and maritime cases, and maritime administrative cases. Improve the trial mechanism of high -quality cases, clarify that the president of the Court is mainly tried by the president of the court, and strives to strengthen the trial function. Strengthen up and down communication, make full use of professional judges' meetings and trial committees, and uniformly referery standards. Strengthen the awareness of the judgment of boutique cases, improve the quality of the referee documents, attach importance to the performance of the case demonstration effect, and demonstrate the justice of judicial justice. Emphasize the timely refining and summing up the difficulties of law, experience and work highlights of the application of laws in time. The "Elken Wheel" case concluded by the court, the foreign parties took the initiative to agreed to the original agreement from the British arbitration and applied to British law to the court to sue and apply Chinese law, which fully reflects the parties in countries along the “Belt and Road” countries along the “Belt and Road” countries. The recognition of China's good business environment and the professional judicial capabilities of the Chinese Maritime Court, the case was written into the work report of the Supreme People's Court in 2022. The court's trial of Beihai Naizhi Ocean Technology Co., Ltd. claimed that the 31st guidance cases released by the Marine and Fishery Bureau of Beihai Ocean and Fishery were selected as the 31st instructions issued by the Supreme People's Court and the second batch of UN Environmental Planning Agency Database China Environmental Judicial Judicial Cases. The case is the first time that the Guangxi Court's trial cases were selected for the guidance case and UN case library released by the Supreme People's Court, which achieved two breakthroughs in the Guangxi Court.

2. Establish a "boutique" assessment mechanism to create an upward atmosphere of excellence

Organize judges to carry out the "Five One" activities and select them every year, that is, "Read a boutique book, organize a boutique case, open a demonstration court, produce an excellent referee document, write a research article, academic papers or cases analyze". Among them, a boutique case is organized, a demonstration court trial, and producing an excellent referee document. These three projects adopt a bottom -up recommendation method to organize senior judges to score the recommendation objects. Formulate the commendation quota according to the scoring results, and the corresponding plan will be submitted to the trial committee for research and decision. At the same time, the selection of the best cases from the selection of the best courts, the excellent demonstration court trial, and the evaluation of excellent referee documents. Since 2020, there have been 22 cases, 6 trials, and 5 referee documents in the evaluation activities carried out by the Supreme People's Court and the High Court of the Autonomous Region. The top ten typical cases of environmental resource administrative categories, 2 cases were selected as "Chinese Court of the Year", etc.; 1 referee document won the third prize of the 8th National Administrative Judgment Outstanding Business Achievement Selection (referee document). There are 34 research reports and papers won awards among the various reviews organized by the courts and the Law Society.

3. Establish an incentive mechanism for "excellent results" to stimulate positive endogenous motivation

The hospital issued the "Implementation Opinions on Further Strengthening Judicial Research Work" and established an incentive mechanism for the implementation of high -quality strategic implementation. For various typical cases, excellent referee documents, excellent demonstration trials, academic papers, and research results evaluation activities organized by the Police Police Gong or personal award. Since 2020, three police officers have won the third -class merit of the special work and the four policemen have won the personal prize of the special work. At the same time, combine the strategic achievements with the performance assessment of the department's department and the personal evaluation of the individual evaluation, strengthen internal incentives and external assessments, and stimulate the enthusiasm and initiative of cultivating boutiques. (Written by Liang Yunjie)

- END -