Electric vehicle on the elevator was blocked by the elevator to take a video of the video car owner to violate the reputation right to lose the lawsuit

In recent years, the tragedy of electric vehicles into residential buildings in many places across the country caused fire and even causing casualties, but some people still ignored it. Li in Nanjing was ready to quarrel with the other party when he was preparing to take the electric vehicle by the elevator. The neighbor took a video and sent it in the WeChat group in the community. Li complained to the court on the grounds of infringement of the right to reputation. The reporter from the Yangtze Evening News learned from the People's Court of Nanjing Jiangbei New District that the court recently made a judgment on the case and rejected all Li's claims.

Yangtze Evening News/Zi Niu Journalist Wan Chengyuan

Push the electric vehicle upstairs and cause quarrels to be photographed

On the day of the incident, Li was going to push the electric vehicle into the elevator and was blocked by Zhao. During the quarrel, Zhao filmed the video and posted the video into the WeChat group in the community.

In this video, Li's whole body is clearly visible. Based on this, Li believes that Zhao's behavior has caused his image to be damaged. Lost 5,000 yuan. "

In response, the Jiangbei New District Court heard that illegal acts that infringement of the right to reputation are usually implemented in an insult and slander, which is subjectively malicious. In this case, Zhao uploaded a video. Although he had published inappropriate remarks, he did not create false facts or insults and slandered Li, so he did not constitute a damage to Li's reputation.

The court stated that "personal reputation and social evaluation should be maintained by their own good behaviors. Li Mou facilitated himself and violated relevant management regulations, and publicly promoted the elevator for the elevator. If others are not allowed to give pointers and criticism, they cannot show the fairness and justice of the law, and it is not conducive to maintaining normal social order. "

Based on this, the court's decision rejected all Li's claims.

Judge: legitimate behavior, support

The judge affirmed the approach to stopping and reflecting the incident, and said that "the Civil Code guarantees the reputation of citizens, but to let others evaluate well, first of all, you must do it yourself."

"The judicial significance of reputation is to protect the social evaluation of the reputation of others by preventing and cracking down on the right to infringe on the right to the reputation by insulting, slandering, and false publicity reports, etc. According to the case, the plaintiff is going to push the electric vehicle into the elevator. This behavior violates the "Provisions on the Fire Safety Management of High -level Civil Construction" issued by the National Emergency Management Department and implemented on August 1, 2021. Article 37 of the provision is clearly clear It is forbidden to park electric bicycles or electric bicycles or charge electric bicycles in high -rise civil buildings, evacuation aisles, stairwells, safe exports.

"So, Zhao stands up to stop the electric vehicle into the elevator. It is justified to reflect the matter through the WeChat group to truly reflect this matter.

- END -