Quick comments 丨 Also fight each other?Simplify the "Pu Law"

The simplified "Pu" of "fighting against each other" and so on, bypassing the "evil" that people are really worried and realistic, are essentially a kind of escape.

Recently, on the short video platform, the "Pu" video with "unable to fight back, and still fights with each other" has spread. Then, the arguments such as "winning the prison and losing the hospital" have also triggered discussions. Some people even accused those who were hit after being beaten. It seemed that this was the cause of violent upgrade.

There is no doubt that such public opinion has exacerbated people's concerns about illegal violations. With the influence of this view, some people will not only learn how to use the "law", but it is even more confused. The only solution seems to have one word left: Run.

But in fact, it is not necessarily a fight for each other, or it can be just defense or seeing righteousness. Just to defense is the right to citizens given by the law, and it is also an important legal weapon for struggling with illegal behaviors. Seeing righteousness is also a common means to promote righteousness and fight against illegal. Regardless of whether it is affection, in virtue, or rationality, and in the law, both defense and righteousness should be recognized and advocated. Among the current legal system, legitimate defense and righteousness have not been absent. In recent years, it has been further strengthened in the revision of the criminal law and the compilation of the Civil Code.

For example, the amendment of the Criminal Law in 1997 made significant adjustments to the legitimate defense system, relaxed the limits of legitimate defense, and added a special defense system. This revision clearly stated that "" killing, robbery, rape, kidnapping, and other severe crimes that seriously endangers personal safety, and adopt defense behaviors, causing illegal invasion of casualties, are not excessive defense and are not criminal responsibility. "In September 2020, the Supreme People's Court, the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and the Ministry of Public Security jointly issued the" Guiding Opinions on Application for the Application of Justice Defense Systems in accordance with the law ". The release and implementation of the "Guidance Opinions" is of great significance to properly handle legitimate defense cases for accurate understanding and application of legitimate defense, properly handle legitimate defense cases, safeguard the proper defense rights of citizens, encourage righteousness, and promote social righteousness.

Article 184 of the "Civil Code" clearly stipulates that if the rescue behavior is caused by voluntary emergency rescue behavior, the rescue person shall not bear civil liability. This clause exempts the damage caused by the rescue of the rescue from the legislative level. Its legislative purpose is to "support" the good people and eliminate the multiple concerns of the people who see the poverty alleviation and the poverty alleviation and come forward. This can also be regarded as the legislative response after many years of "good people law" after many years of appeal in the academic and society.

Of course, whether in the criminal law or in the field of civil law, it is not perfect for legislative protection of legitimate defense and righteousness, and there is still room for further improvement. In the field of judicial, because the cases are always very different, the specific cases may cause the final judicial identification to change because of the evidence materials of a fine branch and even a small factors that are not noticeable. The principle law of law cannot be given the answer to each case that can be "seated". In the process of specific case handling, it is particularly important whether judicial personnel can be objective, accurate, and fair. It is necessary to eat the spiritual spirit of the law, follow the fairness of fairness, and make a judgment that is reasonable in law. It does not require rigorous professional skills to do not independent, but also requires the judicial conscience of "power under the law".

Rather than being worried about the so -called "explanation of the law" that "fights with each other", it is better to say that people are worried about the errors such as "who can make trouble and who can make sense", "who is dead and injured", and other error tendencies, as well as Judicial corruption such as collusion between power and money, handling "human affairs", and supporting "protective umbrellas" for the evil forces.

The simplified "Pu" of "fighting against each other" and so on, bypassing the "evil" that people are really worried and realistic, are essentially a kind of escape. These popular bloggers who are good at avoiding the "Thunder Area" and those who dare not see righteousness are actually the same type of people in the two scenarios.

Editor Zhao Yu

- END -