"Drunk" and guilty!The Chengyang Court concentratedly sentenced 8 cases of dangerous driving and released typical cases

Peninsula All Media Reporter Ge Mengjie Correspondent Shi Xiaomeng

In order to further deter the illegal and criminal behavior of driving after the wine, and achieve the "trial case, education one", the law of law, on August 11, the Chengyang Court tried to hear 8 cases of dangerous driving, and invited driving school trainees to listen to observe In the trial, through lively cases, "zero distance" received security education for the rule of law, and guided the establishment of a solid awareness of road traffic safety.

The eight defendants in the trial were all first, and voluntarily pleaded guilty. The Chengyang Court sentenced the eight defendants to the eight defendants for one month to two months with dangerous driving, and fined 2,000 to 6,000 yuan. After the sentence, eight defendants expressed their sentence and did not appeal.

It is understood that the Chengyang Court has conducted in -depth "escorting 20 hundred -day tackling operations" to prevent public safety risks, and insists on having severely cracking down on "drunk driving". Since 2022, the Chengyang Court has concluded a total of 84 dangerous driving sins and 84 people. Most of the defendants of the eight dangerous driving cases concentrated in this concentrated sentence have been punished for crimes or driving after drinking. Some defendants have no license and driving, and accidents occur after drunk driving. , June.

After the sentence was over, the Chengyang Court released the "Top Ten Top Ten Teny Cases of Dangerous Driving in the Chengyang Court". Through the case of the case, it aims to educate the masses to build the concept of "drinking without driving, driving without drinking", calling on the masses to be awe of the law, consciously abide by traffic laws and regulations, travel safely, drive civilized, avoid "drunk and guilty" , Commonly maintaining social harmony, peace and stability.

Typical cases of trial of dangerous driving crime trial in the Chengyang District People's Court of Qingdao City, Shandong Province

Case 1: The defendant Guo Mou drove a small passenger car to the north to the south of the West Gushan Bridge about 50 meters southeast of the West Girl Gushan Bridge, which was about 50 meters southeast of the West Girl Gushan Bridge along Chengyang District, causing two cars to Damage, Guo's injury. After testing the blood samples of the defendant after the accident, the ethanol content in the blood was 390mg/100ml, which was drunk driving. After on -site investigation and investigation, the defendant Guo, the defendant, assumed the full responsibility of the accident. After the incident, the defendant Guo was seized by the police on the spot when he was waiting at the scene. During the case handling, Guo was unknown and could not be rejected.

Results: Guo was sentenced to six months of detention for dangerous driving and fined RMB 17,000.

Typical significance: The defendant was sentenced to punishment for administrative penalties for unlicensed driving, and he was sentenced to punishment for two crimes of dangerous driving. He still did not know how to repent. The accident occurred after drinking, and the alcohol content was far more than 300mg/100ml.

Case 2: The defendant Wang drove a small car after drinking, and drove south to north of Yuansheng Road in Chengyang District to the south of the Sino -Railway 17th Bureau. After hitting the two small passenger cars parked by Niu Moujia and Niu Mou B, the four vehicles were damaged and Du Mou injured. After on -site investigation and investigation, the defendant Wang was fully responsible for the accident. After detecting the blood samples of the extract, the content of ethanol in the blood was 218.5mg/100ml, which was drunk driving.

The result of the referee: Wang was sentenced to four months of detention for the crime of dangerous driving and fined 9,000 yuan.

Typical significance: The defendant drove an accident after drunk, causing four cars to damage, one person injured, and did not compensate the victims. The alcohol content exceeded 200 mg/100ml, which was severely punished.

Case 3: The defendant Zhang drove a small car after drinking. When the West Men west road from the Shandong Light Industry Engineering School of Shandong Province from the east to the right of Chongren Road, the unlicensed two -wheeled motorcycle driving with Zhao The accident caused two cars to damage and Zhao. After on -site survey and investigation, Zhang was responsible for the main responsibility of the accident, and Zhao assumed the secondary responsibility of the accident. After detecting the blood samples of the extract, the content of ethanol in the blood was 329.9mg/100ml, which was drunk driving.

Results: Zhang was sentenced to four months of detention for Zhangfeng, and fined 14,000 yuan.

Typical significance: The defendant drove an accident after drunk, causing two cars to damage and one person injury. The alcohol content exceeded 300 mg/100ml, which was severely punished according to law.

Case 4: During the period of the defendant Du, during the bail pending trial, when the drunk drove the taxi along the east to west of the village market from east to west to the entrance of Tmall shop, drove into the left of the road, and it was like Guo's passenger car parked. Crash, causing two cars to be damaged and unattended. After detecting the blood samples of the extract, the content of ethanol in the blood was 212.6mg/100ml, which was drunk driving. After on -site investigation and investigation, the defendant Du Mou bears the entire responsibility of the accident. After the incident, the defendant Du Mou took the initiative to the case after receiving the telephone notice of the public security organs, and reached an accident damage compensation agreement with Guo. Guo did not ask Du to compensate.

The referee results: Revisit the Jemo District People's Court to announce the probation of the defendant Du. Du's crime of dangerous driving, sentenced to three months of detention, and fined 8,000 yuan; four months of punishment with the former crime, and a fine of RMB 2,000 and fined. RMB 10,000.

Typical significance: The defendant was punished for administrative punishment for driving after drinking. During the probation test period, he found missed crimes, canceled probation, and punished several crimes.

Case 5: The defendant Liu Mou had a license to drive a van and drove the noodles north to north to the north of Baisha River Bridge along the north road of Anshun District, Chengyang District. After detecting the blood samples of the extracts, the content of ethanol in the blood was 117.2 mg/100ml, which was drunk driving. After the incident, the defendant Liu was summoned by the public security organs. The referee: Liu was sentenced to one month of detention for the crime of dangerous driving, and fined RMB 2,500.

Typical significance: The defendant was drunk and drunk to drive a motor vehicle. The social harm was greater and punished according to law.

Case 6: After the defendant Han, he drove a second -wheeled motorcycle to a village committee to escape after a traffic accident with a small car. Later, Han refused to cooperate with blowing gas testing and blood drawing test, and knocked the law enforcement recorder in the hands of the police, pushed and caught the police. The blood samples extracted after the seized were detected. The ethanol content in the blood was 119 mg/100ml, which was drunk driving. After the incident, the defendant Han was arrested.

Results: Han was sentenced to one month of detention for a dangerous driving crime, and fined 7,000 yuan; he was sentenced to six months in prison for the crime of obstructing public affairs. It was decided to execute six months in prison and fined 7,000 yuan.

Typical significance: After the defendant was drunk, he resisted the police inspection, and at the same time constituted the crime of obstructing official duties, counting crimes and punishment.

Case Seven: The defendant Liang Mou drove a small car and drove the south to the north to 120km+900m along the Longqing Expressway. He had a rear -end accident with a small car driving in front of him. Liao was injured. After detecting the blood samples of the extract, the content of ethanol in the blood was 197.7mg/100ml, which was drunk driving. The defendant Liang was all responsible for the accident.

Results: Liang was sentenced to three months and fifteen days for the crime of dangerous driving, and fined 7,000 yuan.

Typical significance: The defendant had an accident in drunk driving motor vehicles on the highway, causing cars to damage, one person injury, and did not compensate the victims, punished severely according to law.

Case 8: During the probation test period of the defendant, the defendant Luo drove a small car without a license after drinking. After detecting the blood samples of the extract, the content of ethanol in the blood was 203.7mg/100ml, which was drunk driving. After the incident, Luo took the initiative to go to the case and compensated the damage to the loss of facilities.

Residents: Revised the Licang District People's Court to announce the probation of the defendant Luo. Luo's crime of dangerous driving was sentenced to three months of detention, and a fine of 8,000 yuan was fined. He was punished for two months with the former crime, and a fine of RMB 5,000 was fined. 13,000 yuan.

Typical significance: The defendant was drunk drunk again during the probation test period of the probation test, canceled the probation, and punished several crimes.

Case 9: The defendant Ding Mou drove a small passenger car after drinking, and drove east to west along Xiata Road, Chengyang District to the intersection of Heilongjiang Road. No one hurts. After on -site investigation and investigation, the defendant Ding was equally responsible for the accident. After detecting the blood samples of the extract, the content of ethanol in the blood was 178.4mg/100ml, which was drunk driving. After the incident, Ding rejected the case and was arrested by the police.

Results: Ding was sentenced to two months of detention for dangerous driving and fined 7,000 yuan.

Typical significance: The defendant had an accident in drunk driving. After the incident, he rejected the case and punished severely according to law.

Case 10: During the detention of the motor vehicle driver's license, the defendant Li drove a small sedan to the west to east of Wenyang Road from Wenyang District, Chengyang District to the entrance of Yiyun Hotel. After detecting the blood samples of the extract, the content of ethanol in the blood was 189.3mg/100ml. After the incident, the defendant Li was summoned to the case by the phone.

The result of the referee: Li committed the crime of dangerous driving, sentenced to two months of detention, and fined 6,500 yuan.

Typical significance: The defendant was detained by driving license for driving on the road due to the driving of a scrapped standard. During the detention of the motor vehicle driving license, he was still drunk to drive a motor vehicle and punished severely according to law.

- END -