"Customs checks luxury goods at low prices for sale" Women bought a bunch of troublesome things

"Customs check luxury goods and sell at low prices." Many citizens have seen such "propaganda words" in some micro -business or friends. But if you buy it, it is likely to face consumer disputes. The woman in our city Alan spent more than 200,000 yuan in shopping and encountered such troubles. It turned out that the woman Ali said that her relatives worked in the customs and could obtain various luxury items seized by the customs, which was far lower than the market price. Alan purchased perfumes, famous watches, jewelry and other items from Allan, and gave it to friends. As a result, friends reported that these were fakes ... Alan called Ali to court in a furious.

Alan said that she was introduced with Ali, and Ali said that his relatives worked in a certain customs and could obtain various luxury items seized by the customs, and far below the market price, and believed that she thought it was true. Ali sells Rolex, Vanke Yabao, Cardia, Breguet, Chanel, and Chanel in the name of selling customs at low prices. Brand watches such as Omega, DW, Patek Philippe, and brand leather bags, green tourmaline rings, pigeon blood diamonds, ivory jewelry, emerald, Afghan white jade, perfume and other items. Alan has paid more than 220,000 yuan.

Alan said that he presented the items he purchased to friends, and later reported by friends that these items were not genuine, but fake and inferior products were posted by the above brands. As soon as Alan was angry, Ali asked Ali to issue a certificate of purchase from the above items. Ali issued a list of items for the administrative punishment of customs in a bonded area, and promised that the source of the items was legal, reliable and genuine, but Alan still doubted it. After that, Alan returned the purchase of the watch to Ali, and asked Ali to refund the money and other items and compensate the loss. Alan believes that Ari deliberately concealed the true source of items they sold and constituted a fraud on herself, so she sued the court.

The defendant Ali argued that the two parties had reached an agreement on the investigation of the Anshan Industry and Commerce Bureau, and reached an agreement on the buying and selling goods. Alan only returned the watch and some products to himself, and the rest of Alan stayed. On the spot, I paid Alan 70,000 yuan, and there were no other disputes between the two parties. Alan's full -scale civil behavior capabilities should bear responsibility without fraud and coercion. In this case, the goods sold by any department are fakes. In summary, the request rejected the plaintiff's claim.

The court found that the facts are as follows: The defendant Ali was sold to Alan watches, necklaces and other items in the name of luxury goods such as Rolex, LV, such as Rolex, LV, such as the customs, such as 1600 yuan, Rolex 3600 yuan, Omega 2,000 yuan, Jiang Shi Constantinon Table 3,000 yuan and so on. Later, Ali asked for refund because the items sold by Alan were not genuine, but the two parties did not reach an agreement. Alan reported to the Industrial and Commercial Bureau that Ali sold fakes. After mediation of the Industry and Commerce Institute, the agreement was voluntarily reached. The agreement stipulated that the problem of doubts about the previous purchase of goods was solved at one time: "Ali refunded to Alan to 10,000 yuan for 10,000 yuan at one time The whole, including the previous refund of 30,000 捌 捌 捌 捌 柒 柒 柒 整 整 整 整 整 整 整 整 整 整 整 整 整 will no longer say in various statements and controversy. " Both signed the agreement.

The court believes that the items purchased from the defendant's office are international brand luxury goods. As a person who has the ability to fully civil behavior, in a society with developed information, it can fully know the price of the goods they purchased at the counter. The defendant purchased the above items at a price below the price of the counter. And the original and defendants have reached a mediation agreement under the auspices of the real and false of the goods. The agreement clearly stipulates the agreement on how the dispute between the original and the defendant is resolved. The agreement was established in accordance with the law and was protected by law. And the dispute between the original and defendants on the issue of the authenticity of the goods has reached an agreement. Therefore, the court does not support the plaintiff's claim. In summary, in accordance with the provisions of the Civil Procedure Law and the Supreme People's Court's Several Provisions on Civil Litigation Evidence "and" Consumer Rights Protection Law ", the plaintiff's claim was rejected. All media reporter Zhang Ling

- END -