Hubei Huanggang reported a typical case of illegal production safety, and the three companies were fined 379,000 yuan!

Ji Mu News reporter Huang Zhong

Correspondent Wang Biyong

Safety production responsibility is more important than Taishan. On August 7, Jimu Journalists learned from the Huanggang Municipal Emergency Administration that the bureau recently notified three typical cases of illegal laws, and the three companies were fined 379,000 yuan. The relevant person in charge of the Huanggang Municipal Emergency Administration said that it will further promote the implementation of the main responsibility of the enterprise to implement the main body of production safety, urge enterprises to do a good job of investigation and rectification of hidden dangers, and continuously improve the safety level of the enterprise.

Law enforcement officers carry out safety production inspections (the picture is provided by the correspondent)

【Case number one】

On April 13 this year, when law enforcement officers of the Tuanfeng County Emergency Administration conducted a safety inspection of a chemical Co., Ltd., they found that the company's industrial and trade expansion projects did not carry out safety facilities.

Law enforcement officers of the Tuanfeng County Emergency Administration issued the "Instructions for Equal Rectification within a time limit" to the company in accordance with the law, and the rectification was in place within the end of the month.

The company violated the relevant provisions of the "Three" supervision and management measures of the safety facilities of construction projects. According to relevant regulations, the Tuanfeng County Emergency Administration imposed an administrative penalty of RMB 15,000 for the company.

【Case 2】

Huanggang Emergency Bureau organized experts to conduct a safety inspection of a chemical technology Co., Ltd. in Hubei and found that the unit's class A warehouse (stored toluene solvents and other flammable and explosive substances. Explosive dangerous area) The human electrostatic release device is non-original, which does not meet the requirements of the "SHT 3097-2017) 5.2.7" SHT 3097-2017). According to the division of jurisdiction, the Huanggang Emergency Bureau will handle illegal clues and related information to the Huangzhou District Emergency Bureau. The Huangzhou District Emergency Bureau issued the "Instructions for Equal Rectification within a time limit" and required to be rectified within a time limit. On the morning of January 14 this year, the unit was reviewed and hidden dangers have been rectified.

The company violated the relevant provisions of the "Safety Production Law of the People's Republic of China". According to relevant regulations, the Huangzhou District Emergency Administration imposed an administrative penalty of a fine of RMB 30,000.

【Case III】

On January 15 this year, a on -site inspection of a certain Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd. in Wudo found that the company existed (1) 48 people involved in key supervision technology, and the actual number of evidence obtained was 19; (2) January 2022, January 2022 On the 9th, the "Fire Safety Operation Certificate" was not on the fire content of the sewage station. , In the manual of methanol safety technology instructions, no production units name, contact phone number, etc., no preparation date, no safety label on the category library acetic acid butyl acetate material; ; (5) The assessment record of the completion of the safety production target is only provided for the assessment records of the safety action plan and performance of the main person in charge in July 2021, and the issues such as the unacceptable risk list and inaccurate the heat stroke.

The company violates the relevant provisions of the "Safety Production Law of the People's Republic of China" and the "Regulations on the Safety Management of Hazardous Chemicals". According to relevant regulations, the Wujiao Emergency Administration shall order the company to make corrections within a time limit and punish the administrative penalty of RMB 334,000.

- END -