Comments 丨 Don't let the real information blocked the "real name report"

The network itself does not solve the problem, and it is impossible to allow unreasonable or illegal demands to achieve with the help of public opinion

After the "Tangshan barbecue restaurant beating" incident, real -name reporting phenomena appeared densely. Some people have strived for legal rights and interests by reporting, but also pay attention to that in many reports, some people try to use the Internet for their unknown or conceptual differences. A certain waste of resources.

Seeking justice or making rumors?

On June 15, Henan Hebi Ping An Qibin issued a notice saying that "the police illegally beat my father to cause him to die". "After Xu Mou Huai drove the electric two -wheeled car home, he hit the black Magotan car that stopped on the side of the road, causing him to fall into the hand, legs and other injuries." The acute attack of the heart disease causes sudden heartogenic death. "

As far as a family is concerned, it is extremely sad to his father's death. The child wants to ask his father to ask for a reason for reason. However, in any case, the report should be based on facts, the law as the criterion, does not accuse others, does not exaggerate its words, and no one can use the name of "reporting" to do "false".

In the statement of the reporter, the father -in -law rode an electric vehicle and a car argued with a car, and had disputes with the owner. Several police officers in Jinshan Police Station, Pangcun Town, Qibin District, Hebi City were suspected of illegally using analogy during the process of dealing with traffic accidents. He had violent beating, causing his father to die on his way to the doctor.

Compared with the two, the statement of the two sides has a huge dislocation. If there are different positions and different angles, there are poor information and poor cognitives in the middle, and the situation of "you don't understand me" and "I don't agree with you" can be understood to some extent, but in any case, the bottom line cannot deviate from the fact itself itself Essence

In the final analysis, the differences in legal cognition and the misalignment of law enforcement have caused conflict between the two parties to a certain extent. This may also be the cause of the phenomenon of "reporting" and "complaints". But the establishment of trust is to communicate on the one hand, and on the other hand, it requires not only understanding each other's difficulties, but also adhering to the framework of the law.

Why do malicious reports frequently appear?

The false report of Henan Hebi was not alone. Recently, the Jiangsu Haimen Police also issued a notification response to the "several men in Haimen with a steel pipe", saying that the speech released by the netizen Zhu Ting was inconsistent with the facts.

Judging from the report issued by the police, who is actually clear, why do you need to report online? Perhaps the reporting cost is too low. For reporters, if you wish, it would naturally make a profit. If it was not successful, he would not be punished.

In fact, it is not uncommon in reality similar to the contradictions caused by disputes. The "Police Honor", which just ended the popularity, let us see the overall situation of some cases. There is a case in the play that is impressive. The uncle walks the dog and scares the child. The young mother pulls the child to leave the right place, but is stopped by the uncle. As a result, the uncle's family had made a hospital and a police station, and even went to the child's house to squat ... In the final result, the police could only hold the troubles of the trouble through other cases. It can be said that the disposal of similar incidents makes the police, victims, and the audience watching the drama feel aggrieved.

Although the TV series is not reality, it also comes from reality. The indulgence of evil deeds is not only the harm to the victim, but also the "shackles" of the law enforcement, but also greatly waste administrative resources, which is a great provocative to fairness and justice. Even more, some people have become unscrupulous because they have tasted the "sweetness" and breed the psychology of borrowing reports and retaliation. If it is developed, it will also affect people's trust in justice.

Therefore, in the face of malicious reports, the law enforcement department is not enough if it is only from the perspective of public concern. Only while clarifying the public, it is also possible to deal with malicious reporters in accordance with the law.

Only by adhering to the law can maintain justice

In the Internet era, the network as a window provides an unfair way for the general public, and it also helps some people to expand justice. A paragraph, a few pictures, and a video can quickly enter the public vision, causing great attention. Because of this, it makes some people see hope and some people can see "opportunities".

It must be reminded that the network itself does not solve the problem, and it is impossible to allow unreasonable or illegal demands to achieve with the help of public opinion. It just attracted attention, and the final result was always based on the legal basis. Some people try to obtain the "ideal" result of social support in their cognitive framework because they are unfamiliar with the law and follow the simple "truth", and they are likely to want to fall in the air. And those who try to touch fish in muddy water and use public opinion to kidnap judicial unreasonable demands and acts on the way, will also hurt the public's emotions and trigger a crisis of trust.

What must be faced is that the real -name report triggered the imitation and triggered public opinion. Faced with the fluttering online public opinion, the judicial organs are facing greater pressure. The more this moment, the more we must adhere to the legal bottom line. Only in this way can we maintain the fairness and justice of the law, so that real -name reports can return to their original heart, and can get the trust and support of the public.

In the final analysis, netizens are not judges. Public opinion is not Shangfang Sword. It is justified to discuss it. The law is the fundamental. Do not let the real -name report be a illegal helper, let alone block the real real real report.Editor Zhao Yu

Red Star Review Submission Email: [email protected]

- END -