I owe 4.9 million not to pay back.

The Yangtze River Daily Da Wuhan Client August 3 (Reporter Geng Shanshan Correspondent Dong Xingxing) On August 3, the reporter was informed that in a case of borrowing disputes together, a man forged his ex -wife signed and fined 50,000 yuan by the Xinzhou District Court.

In 2017, Mr. Zhao lent Ms. Lin 4.9 million yuan. Ms. Lin mortgaged in the name of her name, and the two parties signed a loan mortgage contract. After the contract expired, because Ms. Lin did not return the loan, Mr. Zhao sued to Xinzhou District Court.

During the trial of the case, Ms. Lin's ex -husband, Mr. Lin, submitted to the court to authorize the entrustment of the lawsuit of the lawsuit of the case, and participated in the trial mediation on behalf of Ms. Lin.

After mediation, the two parties reached a mediation agreement: Ms. Lin returned 4.9 million yuan in loans, and Mr. Zhao needed to cooperate with the seizure of the mortgage property.

After the case entered the enforcement stage, Ms. Lin said that she did not know that the original trial had this case, and did not authorize anyone to participate in the original trial lawsuit and signed, and raised objections to the authenticity of the authorized attorney.

According to the handwriting identification, it was finally confirmed that the authorization of the authorized attorney was signed by Ms. Lin himself. In front of the appraisal opinion, Mr. Wang acknowledged that he had falsely signed his ex -wife.

Due to the violation of the voluntary principle of the original trial, the procedure has flaws, and the re -audit conditions are met, and the trial committee of the Xinzhou District Court discusses the decision, and the case starts the retrial procedure.

In civil litigation activities, it is impersonating to signature without obtaining the authorization of others and issuing a forged authorization attorney to the court. The benefits are damaged and seriously obstruct the order of litigation. The illegal act will be severely punished by law.

Even if the two sides are husband and wife or parents and children, they also have their own independent lawsuit status. One party has no right to represent the other party to conduct litigation activities without real authorization.

In the case of the judge, in the case, Mr. Wang pseudoly authorized the power of attorney and pretended to be others to participate in the lawsuit. It was an obstacle to the judicial behavior and led to the retrial of the case, causing a waste of judicial resources, and should bear the corresponding legal responsibility.

A few days ago, the Xinzhou District Court made a fine of 50,000 yuan on Mr. Wang in accordance with the law.

【Edit: Wang Rongfei】

- END -