Can farmers encourage farmers to buy houses, can it be effective?

Promoting public services equalization is the key

Recently, many places have launched policies to encourage farmers to enter the city to buy houses.

According to incomplete statistics, including Funing County, Jiangsu, Yanji City, Jilin, Huadian City, Qinglong County, Guizhou, Ningnan County, Sichuan, and other places, they have successively issued policies to encourage farmers to enter the city to buy houses. It is worth noting that areas that have recently introduced relevant policies are mainly concentrated in county or county -level cities.

Recently, the county's real estate market has fallen, and the county's second -hand housing has been listed for a year.

In this context, can farmers encourage farmers to enter the city to buy housing policies, can it be effective?

Encourage farmers to buy a house in many places

China News Weekly discovered that this round of policies that encouraged farmers to enter the city to buy houses accompanied by many supporting measures.

For example, on August 5th, the "Notice on Further Promoting the Steady and Healthy Development of the County's Real Estate Industry" (hereinafter referred to as the "Notice") issued by Funing County, Jiangsu (hereinafter referred to as the "Notice"), launched ten policies around the subsidies of house purchase and difficulties in helping enterprises.

In response to farmers 'entry into the city to buy houses, Funing County, Jiangsu stipulated that those who meet the 2022 farmers' improvement policies who purchase new commercial housing in the county seat, can repeatedly enjoy the first "notice" regulations on the basis of the original farm house improvement preferential policies. , Two policies (given house purchase subsidies and settlement subsidies for settlement).

Ningnan County, Sichuan stipulates that for the purchase of large silkworm breeding households who built new commercial houses and sell the top 100 cocoons annually, a house subsidy is given 10,000 yuan.

In addition, there is an extension of public policy. The "Notice" in Funing County stipulates that if you participate in social insurance in the name of a personal name, you can pay the housing provident fund, pay for 6 months and enter the county seat to buy a house, and you can enjoy the housing provident fund loan.

In some places, "work hard" on the household registration. For example, Qinglong County, Guizhou, requires further simplifying agricultural transfer of population to buy houses.

Among these policies, the exit policy of the homestead has attracted much attention.

"Several Measures for the Paraception and Healthy Development of the Real Estate Industry" released by Qianshan City on July 31 on July 31, which is clearly from the date of the spontaneous essay until December 31, 2023. The farmers who settled in urban houses will be rewarded by 50,000 yuan for house purchase after being determined. After the voluntary exit from the homestead and the reclamation of the homestead is reclaimed to a cultivated land or other agricultural land, the original homestead user is contracted and operated, and after the identification, it will be rewarded at 30,000 yuan per mu.

However, similar policies have caused a lot of controversy. Once farmers abandon the homestead, does it mean to give up a guarantee? If farmers' lives in the city are difficult to sustain, can they return to the countryside?

On August 18th, the "Farmers Daily" published a comment that if you want to "attract people with a house" and "stay with people", you must fully protect the rights and interests of farmers and leave the road to farmers.

It is difficult to boost the effect of the market

In fact, the strategy of encouraging farmers to buy houses in the city is not the first time.

As early as the end of 2015, in the context of the "destocking" of real estate, it was an important measure to accelerate the civicization of migrant workers and encourage agriculture to transfer people to buying houses.

At that time, Shanxi, Shandong, Gansu and other provinces clearly introduced policies to encourage and guide farmers to buy houses. For example, Shandong will give farmers to buy houses in the city, tax subsidies, regulatory fees, loan discounts, and property fee subsidies.

Yan Yuejin, chief researcher of the Yiju Research Institute, told China News Weekly that at present, it is highly pressured by the county's real estate market. "The sluggish real estate market in the county town may also directly or indirectly affect local land income," Yan Yuejin said.

For example, Qinglong County, Guizhou, in the first half of the year, the county's total fiscal revenue was 303 million yuan, a year -on -year decrease of 34.0%. Among them, the general public budget revenue was 131 million yuan, a year -on -year decrease of 40.1%.

In fact, the introduction of farmers to buy a house in the city is a part of the county, and many county seats choose to encourage public officials to buy a house.

On August 16, the county party secretary of Changde Shimen County, Hunan, even called on public officials to "buy one to buy two sets, buy two sets and three sets" at the real estate exhibition trade conference.

The second article in Si County, Suzhou, Anhui Province issued the "Initiative on Co -Creation of the Prosperity of the Real Estate Industry", and proposed that the public officials "mobilized relatives and friends around them to participate in house purchase activities with actual actions."

Related data show that Shimen County's soil auction revenue in 2020 was about 1.9 billion, and in the first half of this year, there were only 670 million. The situation of Si County is similar. In the first half of 2022, the land income of Sixian County also decreased sharply.

In the eyes of many industry insiders, whether it is encouraging farmers to enter the city to buy a house, or to mobilize public officials and relatives and friends to buy a house, the effect is difficult to predict.

Recently, the news of second -hand housing in ordinary counties is difficult to sell. Xu Xiaole, the chief market analyst of the Shell Research Institute, believes that without leverage, only a small number of house purchase subsidies are limited.

58 Zhang Bo, Dean of the Branch of Anju House Real Estate Research Institute, also told the media that in 2016, a large number of third- and fourth -tier cities began to invent, and a large number of farmers had consumed the demand for buying a house in the county. The purchasing power has been greatly reduced compared to a few years ago.

At the end of 2021, Yilin City, which was a "population entering the city" policy and wanted to promote farmers to buy a house to buy a house. In June this year, this policy was canceled.

"Stay with a house" must be comprehensive

From the perspective of many industry experts, if you rely on subsidies and encouragement, it is difficult to give the market a strong heart.

The recent comments published by the Economic Daily pointed out that the original intention of such policies is to cope with the downward pressure on the real estate market and dig out the potential of farmers' purchase of houses; on the other hand Insufficient rates and population loss. In fact, many counties are facing huge population pressure. Recently, the Li Jiewei team of Shanghai Maritime University has drawn a map of population flow between Liupu to Qipu, and they found that the population has continuously flowed towards the central urban area of ​​the city. In this population flow, the most serious area of ​​population is the ordinary county in the central and western regions.

Li Yujia, chief researcher at the Guangdong Housing Research Center, told China News Weekly, "The loss of population in many counties is related to the construction of the city in the past 20 years, the city's capital cities, and the construction of national central cities."

However, the situation has changed recently. According to the "Monitoring and Investigation Report in 2021", among migrant workers, 71.3 million people flow across the province, an increase of 780,000 people over the previous year, an increase of 1.1%; The increase of 1.4%, the localization of migrant workers is accelerating.

In May 2022, the General Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the General Office of the State Council issued the "Opinions on Promoting the Urbanization Construction with County Town as an important carrier". significance.

Yan Yuejin believes that in order to boost the market, we must understand the true needs of farmers. In his opinion, farmers who buy a house now are not completely living for living, and they are more children reading, so education support must be done well.

In Li Yujia's opinion, on the basis of doing a good job of public services, the county real estate market will still have great potential to excavate in the future.

"The county seat is the best carrier connecting urban and rural areas. In the county seat, farmers can buy seeds in the town, go to school in the city, return to the village to work farmers or visit their parents, go to the city or sell food, etc. Switching. Compared with ways to let farmers go upstairs and encourage farmers to enter the city, it is a kind of grounding urbanization. "Li Yujia said.

He said, "Recently, the country has launched policies such as a new car purchase tax and new energy vehicles to the countryside. The main force of the recent purchase of cars has also shifted from large cities to county towns and villages. This will further promote the integration of county towns and surrounding towns."

Li Yujia believes that to truly stimulate the potential of the county, it must be that farmers can fully enjoy the public service of the county seat. For example, children can receive good education in the county seat, and parents can receive good elderly care or medical services in the county seat.

"From this perspective, to promote the balanced development of public services and make up for the shortcomings of public facilities, it is a very critical factor that attracts farmers." Li Yujia said.

Author: Zhao Yue ([email protected])

Edit: Sun Xiaobo

Operation editor: Wang Lin

- END -