Comments 丨 17 real estate companies' joint names request to crack down on professional housing, don’t rush to talk about trouble

Why do real estate companies engage in such a joint letter? Maybe this is the real problem that the property market needs to be faced.

Recently, a document entitled "Report on the Reserture Report on Requesting the Maintenance of the Business Environment and Enhance the Investment Confidence in Real Estate Enterprises" has attracted widespread attention. According to the screenshot of the online documents, 17 real estate companies including China Resources Land (Hefei), Anhui Poly Real Estate, and Hefei Longhu Real Estate believed that there are a large number of unreasonable and unconventional rights protection demands in the current Hefei market. So they hope that the Hefei Municipal Government will resolutely curb professional housing troubles and various "malicious rights protection" behaviors.

The feedback that this joint request aroused on the Internet can be imagined. The energy of housing companies and ordinary consumers is too clear. In addition, there are many rotten phenomena in the new house in recent years. Netizens naturally stand on the position of consumers who are vulnerable to harm. I feel that the wealthy real estate companies are working together to make difficulties to consume consumption. By. This simple empathy consumer phenomenon is easy to understand, but how to view the name of the housing company has not needed to conclude.

In this joint document, housing companies have clearly listed the "malicious rights protection" they encountered, such as refusing to recognize the signing of the signing of the house purchase contract and some content terms of supplementary agreement; The rough delivery and returning to the decoration part of the house purchase funds; the contract of the super -purchase housing stipulates that the quality of the community is improved with the subjective needs of individual customers, such as changing the form of the community, changing the outer wall material, enhancing greening, etc. It is not an exaggeration to say that its "malicious rights protection" is.

However, these ordinary people can identify the "malicious rights protection" that ignore the house purchase contract at a glance. Theoretically, there is no need to compromise with real estate companies. It can be directly sanctioned by law through judicial procedures. Why do real estate companies have to do this more and engage in such a joint letter? Maybe this is the real problem that the property market needs to be faced. In other words, behind the obvious "malicious rights protection", there are more common housing companies without explicit issues.

In fact, it is not the first time that "professional housing troubles". Whenever there are twists and turns in the property market, there will be "professional housing troubles" in some places. Some buyers bought a house when the house price was at high, and after seeing the decline of hundreds of thousands or even millions of yuan, naturally dissatisfied. So when the new house is delivered, it proposes more harsh standards, which is equivalent to protesting to developers in disguise. When there is a problem with the new house, the protest is justified. There is no problem to pick out the problem to protest. It is suspected of "malicious rights protection". Among them, there are also some institutions that make money for money to help.

If only a few home buyers come forward, real estate companies can naturally be resolved through judicial channels. But if there are a large number of householders who are dissatisfied, the result of the hard and rigid housing companies may endanger the image of the brand, even more serious consequences, etc. They have to worry about it. This may be the deep reason why real estate companies have to jointly request the local government.

Judging from the information released by this joint letter, on the one hand, the property market needs to be more stable and more rational, and the real estate cannot always be used as an investment product. On the other hand, it is also necessary to maintain the reasonable and stability of the property market policies, and the property market cannot be ups and downs due to changes in the policy. Otherwise, this impact is not only the market, but also the psychological expectations of consumers.

In short, to crack down on the so -called "professional housing troubles", it is necessary to collaborate on housing companies, consumers, and policy makers to make the property market healthy and stable. "Malicious rights protection" will lose the soil.

Edit Yin Shuguang

- END -