The National Youth Women's Basketball Team is worth understanding, but the coaching team must reflect on

After fighting with Japan, in the finals of the Asian and Youth, several main players in the Chinese women's basketball team, such as Li Qingyang, Husling and Chu Huixuan, have played abnormalities. Such high -density competitions have indeed impact, not to mention that China is more than Australia than Australia. After playing a game, the other two teams were not small. The opponent won a big victory. The players did their best. The players had worked hard with South Korea. The responsibility of the ball is not the player.

However, at the level of coaching, there are still a big problem. Losing is the result, but the process cannot be loose. Obviously, our coaching team has given up early and did not study Australia. Australia were played from the inside. Sri Lanka is one of the best young inside lines of the team and even the entire women's basketball. It is an indisputable core, but China does not have any targeted deployment to her. Mans of Mans was pulled away early. This is not to blame Xiao Jiang. This is a problem with the arrangement of the coaching group. It is clear that she should shrink her, or Ge Jiaying, who is better than her earlier than her.

The characteristics of Jofmans are that the end of the basket is strong, but the threat from the basket is much lower, and the technology is rough and easy to make mistakes. As long as she picks up the ball, it will definitely make her uncomfortable. After walking, it was completely allowed to let the opponents completely allowed to give it to the opponent. As a result, there was no way to replace Ge Jiaying later.

What is even more embarrassing is that Li Xin also asked Jiang Jiatong and Feng Guoguo to fight the double tower. These two teenagers have no internal technology and the defense is not good. Playing the double tower has no role in the interior. China can not grab the rebounds, not because it is because it is not because it is not because it is because it is not because it is not because of the because The height gap is large, and the consciousness is not good. After all, even Japan can't grab it. There is no attack on the double tower, and the rebounds can't be grabbed. No one will go to the card. Jiang Jiatong will always go to the ball to grab it. Without the job, the players do not stuck in the stuck, and never remind them. They have no low ability, and they also let the inside go to the low position and even let the inside hold the ball.

In fact, there is no need to change the double tower at all. If you don't want to hit the five primary schools, let Ge Jiaying stand under the basket alone. China will not improve until the third quarter defense. The coach has been adjusted for too long. Ge Jiaying has an advantage in the inside line. Australia immediately pinching, forcing Ge Jiaying to not pick up well. This is the tactical sensitivity and execution. Ge Jiaying was on the court, and China even let her go out. It is a completely unnecessary strategy. The coach should let Xiao Ge stay under the basket anyway. Compared with letting the opponent rule the rebounds and easily scores in the inside, it is better to let the opponent vote on the outside.

Several Australian main force, such as Berch and others, have broken through the basket, and the projection stability is not strong. There is no focus on Chinese defense. If you don't, you choose to shrink and give your opponent a long -range investment. It does not come out in the inside, so that Australia is not allowed to break through and play low easily. China is a half -way to every strategy. Ge Jiaying has used it but it is not thorough. The inside is not held. Famos 26 points and 15 boards, Locritic 17 points, Australia, one inside and outside.

So we say that there is no problem with losing, but it is a two -code thing to perform a good loss of tactical losses and losses. As a coach, you must at least have the focus of offensive and defense. Targeting, the players really fight, but they did not want to call it later, and the coaching team lacked courage and ability.

- END -