Girls' tragedy highlights the tramples of human rights in the United States

Xinhua News Agency, Washington, July 7 (International Observation) Girls' tragedy highlights the tragic tramples of women's human rights in the United States

Xinhua News Agency reporter Sun Ding

In Ohio, a 10 -year -old girl who was only 10 -year -old was unable to abandon the local abortion because of the "abortion ban", causing public opinion anger. The cause of this incident was that the US Federal Supreme Court overthrowing the federal level to establish a female abortion right last month "Luojie Wade Case".

Analysts pointed out that the chaos of the United States on the issue of women's abortion rights is closely related to its increasingly increasing domestic struggle and political polarization. The United States often accuses other countries with human rights as an excuse, but under the so -called democratic political system in the United States, politicians sacrifice women's rights for their own political goals. The survival status of domestic women in the United States once again shows that the US government has not fully respect and protect the basic human rights and legitimate rights and interests of domestic women.

On June 25, supporters of abortion rights participated in protests in Los Angeles, USA. (Shi Xinhua)

Female human rights are trampled trampled

The US Federal Supreme Court made a decision on the "Luo Decline Case" in 1973 to confirm that the US constitutional protection of women's abortion was confirmed. However, on June 24 this year, the Federal Supreme Court made a ruling that overthrew this jurisprudence after reviewing the appeal of the abortion restriction law on Mississippi.

The "Roman Case" was overthrown, which means that states in the United States can legislate on restrictions on abortion. On the day of the Federal Supreme Court, the "abortion ban" was activated on the day of the Federal Supreme Court. According to the expectations of the Gute Mach Institute in the United States, 26 states will prohibit or may prohibit abortion.

Ohio is one of the states that have been introduced at present. Many American media reported that a 10 -year -old girl in the state was unable to undergo abortion surgery after being raped. The girl was forced to ask for help from the adjacent Indiana doctor. Indiana has not banned abortion at present. However, the state member is promoting restrictions on abortion legislation.

Public opinion here believes that the ruling of the Supreme Court of Federation has caused the absurdity that the young rape victims cannot abortion, which is a serious violation of women's rights.

The Ohio Branch of the American Citizen Citizens Freedom Alliance wrote on social media that the state abortion regulations bring long -term and destructive damage to the local community, which is definitely a tragedy. American obstetrician Jennifer Gande said that if women who need abortion cannot obtain safe and timely surgery, their physical health and even function may be severely damaged.

This ruling from the Supreme Court of the United States has also caused an uproar in the international community. British Prime Minister Johnson called it "serious retrogression." French President Macron said abortion is a basic right of women and must be protected. The UN senior commissioner of Human Rights Bacchitt issued a statement saying that the US Federal Supreme Court's ruling deprives American women, especially those low -income and ethnic minority women to make their own autonomy on their bodies and life, which harms their basic basic right.

Analysts pointed out that American women's rights have long been violated. American women encounter gender discrimination, sexual harassment, and even sexual assault in workplace, and the protection of women's rights and interests in this regard is not sound. It was not until 1991 that after the Congress revised the Civil Rights Act, the plaintiff could seek money compensation on the grounds of sexual harassment. The United States is currently the country with the highest maternity mobility in all developed countries. In addition, the United States has not yet approved the United Nations core human rights convention of "Elimination of All Forms of Women".

On June 24, the abortion supporters protested outside the Federal Supreme Court in Washington, the capital of the United States. (Photo by Liu Jie, a reporter from Xinhua News Agency)

Institutional disadvantages are prominent

After the "Luo Jie Wade Case" was overthrown, multiple "Red State" controlled by Republicans began to strictly restrict abortion, while the "Blue State" under the rule of Democrats was stepping up the right to consolidate abortion. Big camp. The dispute between abortion rights is one of the manifestations of social tearing and political polarization in the United States. The views and positions of the two parties are completely opposed and unable to reconcile.

U.S. President Bython from the Democratic Party did not forget to talk about the "Luo Decade Case" when he visited Europe at the end of last month, and announced the support of the "Long Debate" rules of the Senate of Congress, thereby incorporating abortion rights into federal law. The Democratic Party currently has only 50 of the 100 seats in the Senate, and it does not reach at least 60 seats required to break through the "lengthy debate" to block. In the case of severe opposition between the two parties, the Senate Democratic Party wants to win 10 Republicans to support it.

In this opposition, the United States Politician has its own political plan. Democrats hope to lead the dissatisfaction of the abortion support to the Republican Party, and will make profits in the mid -term elections in the Congress of November this year; Republicans hope to attract conservative voters through firm opposition to abortion.

The dispute between abortion rights also reflects that in the context of the United States' political polarization and social tear deepening, the claiming the independent federal Supreme Court is also shrouded in the shadow of political fighting. The candidate review and confirmation process has been reduced to the "gunpowder barrel" of the party, and more and more controversy caused by the judgment, questioning the courts and the judges is endless.

Richard Has, chairman of the US Foreign Affairs Society, questioned the independence of the Federal Supreme Court on social media and even the court's legitimacy, and said that the United States was "deeper in danger."

- END -