Be prepared for possible conflicts?37.2 billion U.S. dollars lost the US media to jump straight

Author: Battle Law Express

According to the Global Network, as soon as the NATO summit ended, the world's largest multi -country military exercise continued. The steps set by the United States have highlight how much emphasis is on maintaining military hegemony in the Pacific region. According to public data, this time the Pacific annual multi -country military exercise has 26 countries, 38 surface ships, 4 submarines, about 117 aircraft and 25,000 soldiers participating in the performance. play.

Global Network pointed out: Behind these specific numbers, there are actually many unprecedented characteristics of the unprecedented characteristics. For example, the United States is strengthening the Asia -Pacific joint combat capabilities, and the goal of the sword finger is obviously the South China Sea, the East China Sea and the Taiwan Strait. Some analysts believe that this is a multi -pronged approach to politics and military, which is to prepare for conflict with China in the future.

The background of the U.S. military exercise was: U.S. President Biden used the Seven Kingdoms Summit and NATO Leadership Summit to carry out a new round of anti -China diplomatic activities. Driven by him, whether it was the Seven Kingdoms Summit or NATO Summit, it was stiffly became a stage of anti -China farce. Obviously, Biden successfully used European and NATO allies to set off a new round of anti -China climax in Europe.

Biden anti -China was on the diplomatic level, while the US Navy held a joint military exercise designed to deal with China in the Asia -Pacific region, which is by no means a coincidence. Obviously, the Pentagon is a military performance on the military performance at the military level to launch large -scale military provocations to China. As a result, Biden's anti -China show in Europe, forming an echo.

But the problem is that the United States performed hard on the international stage and can exchanges for several allies to die for it? Don't look at the huge scale of the Pacific military exercise dominated by the United States, but if there is a conflict between China and the United States one day, how many of the 36 countries participating in the performance can be used as cannon fodder that is willing to act as the US war? These issues are estimated to have the bottom of the White House and Pentagon's politicians. After all, there are few countries in the world who are willing to risk economic losses or the risk of war disaster and China.

Even at the diplomatic level, don't watch Biden's performance in Europe. The announcement issued by the Western series summit has repeatedly mentioned China as the United States wishes. However, European countries such as Germany, the Netherlands, and Belgium do not intend to follow the United States. The leaders of these countries have made a statement that they confirmed that they would not be decoupled with China in the fields of economy, trade, and other areas, and they were reluctant to use the set of against Russia to deal with China.

The United States' repeated provocation of China will not bring any benefits to the country's economic development. Instead, it will lose more market share in China because of the continued deterioration of Sino -US relations. A few days ago, China Civil Aviation announced a heavy news that a number of domestic airlines purchased 292 Airbus A320NEO passenger aircraft from European Airbus, with a total transaction amount of more than $ 37.2 billion. The large order of China and Europe is considered to be the airliner in the global civil aviation field that has severely damaged the US Boeing Corporation.

China has handed huge orders to Europe at this sensitive moment. Although it has a lot to do with Boeing Aircraft's problems in recent years, the results obtained by the long -term negotiations of China Europe have made the American media jumping straight. Bloomberg directly stated in the report: "As the political tensions between China and the United States intensified, the purchasing contract of China and Europe brought a huge impact on the Boeing Company of the United States." Another US media even captured the wind, claiming that "Airbus has a deep connection with Chinese military composite."

Regardless of how the US media interprets the reasons for China's purchase of Airbus aircraft, the Boeing company that lost large orders points to the White House. According to Observer.com, Boeing issued a statement saying "disappointment" and complained that the White House provoked China to lead to "geopolitical differences" between China and the United States, which harmed the company's business prospects. Therefore, Boeing urged the "conversation between China and the United States" in a statement.

Obviously, Boeing's views on this incident are related to the tension between China and the United States, and this is not completely unreasonable. After all, China has previously warned those countries that are closely related to China's economic and trade relations. China is willing to develop economic and trade cooperative relations with all countries, but it does not allow any phenomenon of eating and smashing, and naturally includes the United States. Therefore, the Boeing company lost the big order this time, no matter what factors caused, but the interests of American companies suffered, in a sense, the consequences caused by the US government's blame.

From the perspective of China, since the Boeing company is not as good as anyone, the US government has provoked the confrontation between China and the United States, and there is no need to continue cooperation in some areas. Instead of improving the economic and trade environment of China, or the introduction of policies to improve the market competitiveness of the United States, it requires that countries in the world must cooperate unconditionally with American companies by virtue of their own hegemony. This pair of vassals such as Japan and South Korea may still be used, but it is absolutely unreasonable here in China.

- END -