Counselor Yin Xiyue said this China, they don't do it anymore

Officials of Korean officials said that "the era of export economy is over through China", and Han public opinion has a concern

According to the exclusive report of South Korea's JTBC TV station on the 29th, the Korean government's recently proposed "breaking China" policy has caused heated discussions in South Korean public opinion, and many people have made an opposition and worry about this.

It is reported that during the attendance of the NATO Summit during the NATO Summit, Cui Xiangmu, chief secretary of the Presidential Palace, said at a press conference held in Madrid, Spain on the 29th: "The era of the prosperity of South Korea’ s export economy through China has ended. " It is to strengthen cooperation with Europe to develop the Korean economy. JTBC TV said that China is currently the largest country in South Korea in import and export trade share. Therefore, Cui Xiangmu's words have caused concerns in South Korea.

Cui Xiangmu, chief secretary of the Presidential Palace of South Korea ’s Presidential Palace at a press conference held on the 29th: Numerous News Agency

According to reports, Cui Xiangmu defined Yin Xiyue's "NATO trip" at the press conference on the 29th as a "sales diplomacy" for the Korean nuclear power and national defense industry. He said South Korea will do its best to strive for nuclear power orders in Poland and Czech Republic. Cui Xiangmu also said that after South Korea and the United States established a technical alliance relationship during the visit to South Korea, South Korea will also cooperate with European countries through this "NATO trip" in economic and security.

JTBC television believes that South Korea seems to have begun to participate in the United States and Europe trying to contain China. South Korean scholars said that the South Korean government has taken such actions too anxious and lacks consideration.

According to the analysis of experts, China is still the largest trading country in South Korea. Taking the transaction volume, 25%of the total exports in South Korea and 22.5%of the total imports from last year are from China, and many necessary raw materials in South Korea depend on importing from China. Some relevant persons said (before the Korean government made such a decision), it should consider Korean companies that have entered the Chinese market over the past decades.

South Korea's News News Agency also commented that the South Korean government publicly issued remarks on the policy of "getting rid of China" this time. When the Korean economy is closely related to China, and many Korean companies have developed related business in China, such speeches will not be given to this statement to be given to it. What impact does South Korea bring.

Cui Xiangmu's above remarks have made the policy of "getting rid of China" a hot topic in Korean society. Former South Korean Congress Kim Jong Da (transliteration) said, "In the case of intensified strategic competition in the United States and China, South Korea's proportion of trade with China is still increasing." ") What about this?"

Korean netizens have also expressed opposition and concerns.

A netizen wrote under the relevant report of JTBC TV: "As a country with scarce natural resources, South Korea can occupy a place in the world's top ten economic power. The trading country is China and has a trade surplus for China (for South Korea) China (status) is absolutely (important). Politics and diplomacy exist after all to solve the problem of survival and food and clothing. The trade partner country, (I think) this is not politics, nor diplomacy, but self -destruction. "↓

Another netizen said under "NEWS1": "(Korean government) so I like 'off China'. (Oh) We will finish it. Is there a country with competitiveness? "↓

Source: Global Network/Fu Jiajun

- END -