G7 will raise $ 600 billion against the "Belt and Road"?The slogan is empty, no one pays the money

Author: Battle Law Express

According to the Global Times, a few days ago, the G7 conference held in Germany announced that it would raise $ 600 billion in 5 years to provide developing infrastructure funds for developing countries. Western media generally call this a strategic plan for Western against China's "Belt and Road" initiative. Zhao Lijian, a spokesman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, responded that China has always welcomed all initiatives to promote global infrastructure. We believe that various types of related initiatives do not have problems with each other. We oppose the words and deeds of the initiative to promote geopolitical calculations and smear the "Belt and Road" initiative with the banner of infrastructure construction.

Discussing how to deal with China at the G7 summit has almost become their tradition. This time Biden's ambitious proposal raised $ 600 billion in 5 years to engage in global infrastructure. Although it was not clearly targeted at China, everyone knew it. In fact, at the G7 summit last year, Biden also announced the launch of an infrastructure plan that is considered to be against the "Belt and Road". At that time, the White House said that it would "help improve the infrastructure worth more than 40 trillion US dollars in the total value of developing countries." However, the initiative called "rebuilding a better world" was blocked in the US Congress, and hardly made progress and results. This year, the United States came to engage in this set. The reason why it is so enthusiastic about global infrastructure is a certain strategic purpose.

Some experts say that the real strategic purpose of the United States is to try to use this as an excuse to bring allies to reshape the ability of the United States and the world. And the so -called US $ 600 billion, the United States has only $ 200 billion, and the remaining $ 400 billion is raised by the EU and its allies. The United States is obviously using allies' money to engage in its so -called global infrastructure, and then apply the global influence of the United States in the world. And once this incident is successful, its allies will be allowed. After all, they have invested so much money. If they do not listen to the U.S. suggestions, they are likely to all be drifting. However, the ideal is full, and it is estimated that it is difficult to achieve this goal. Because the West is now facing serious economic problems, it is difficult to raise such a large amount of funds, that is, the probability of the United States itself is also drawing "big cakes" and flickering allies to pay money. After all, last year's G7 summit, Biden announced that it has been a year for the "rebuilding a better world" plan. The US government's investment in global infrastructure has only a slightly insignificant $ 6 million.

The United States has no money, will its allies obediently get money? The probability is not possible, because the G7 is not a iron plate on the option to fight against China. The G7 round -value chairman's Germany advocates approaching China. According to the relevant reports, the German government believes that in the face of the current world situation, the group confrontation between the West and China and Russia should not be formed. Corresponding warning in the West. Germany's opinions are still very willing. At present, it is difficult for China to be effectively solved aside from China, such as climate issues, supply chain issues, and so on. Therefore, in such a background, the plan that the United States appealed in the end is still a high probability.

After all, its allies may not cooperate sincerely. Now that the plan has begun, Germany has already sang it. With the status of Germany in the European Union, it can affect some countries. In addition, the EU also has its own "Global Portal" plan, and it may not be subject to the United States. Isn't it better to use money to enhance the global influence of the European Union. In addition, related development countries may not be selected between China and the United States. They probably have a probability that they will choose and swing left and right. The United States wants to block China's "Belt and Road" plan, which can be described as wrong. Moreover, the United States' global review is not very good. It is difficult for the infrastructure projects invested in the United States to trust people, and its own infrastructure is messy. What's more, the United States has always been indispensable. While conducting global infrastructure, it is likely to perform political penetration and provide some "debt traps" for the establishment of the country. Such operations, Western countries are familiar with this. The majority of developing countries are vigilant about this.

Therefore, the G7's so -called global infrastructure plan against China's "Belt and Road" is likely to be the same as last year. The specific implementation is bound to be difficult. The US $ 200 billion in the United States is estimated that the parliamentary level cannot pass. However, China still has to be vigilant, and its success is that the United States is collecting allies to fight against China. Sometimes it does not work for construction, but it is still possible to do damage, and it is likely to promote the increase in the construction cost of China. In this regard, China must strictly prevent it and be prepared to fight. After all, the imperialism is not dead!

- END -